摘要
任何交际主体在实施任何言语行为时必须满足四项普遍有效性要求:可领会性、真实性、真诚性与合适性。可领会性属于语义要求,真实性、真诚性与合适性则属于语用要求。在语言的认知使用、交互使用与表达使用中,真实性、合适性与真诚性分别被主题化。有效性要求反映了普遍语用学的方法论特征与理论取向:在方法论上,普遍语用学把语义分析与语用分析结合了起来;在理论取向上,普遍语用学代表了欧洲大陆理性主义,超越了英美经验主义的传统。普遍语用学中所提出的有效性要求对我国的语用学研究和话语分析具有重要的指导意义。
Anyone acting communicatively must, in performing any speech act, meet four universal validity claims： compre- hensibility, truth, truthfulness, and rightness. Comprehensibility is a semantic claim, and the other three are pragmatic ones. In the cognitive use of language, truth is thematized ; in the interactive use of language, rightness thematized; in the expressive use of language, truthfulness thematized. Universal pragrnatics＇ methodology and theoretical orientation are reflected in validi- ty claims. In terms of methodology, universal pragmatics combines semantic analysis with pragmatic analysis. In terms of theo- retical orientation, universal pragmatics, transcending Anglo-US empiriealism, represents rationalism in mainland Europe. Va- lidity claims in universal pragmatics are of great significance in guiding pragmatic studies and discourse research in China.
出处
《外语教学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第3期30-33,38,共5页
Foreign Language Education
基金
教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目"中国新闻话语与中国话语建构"(09YJA740003)的研究成果之一
关键词
普遍语用学
有效性要求
主题化
超越
universal pragmatics
validity claims
thematization
transcending
