摘要
司法能动是我国法学理论界和司法实务界讨论的热点。在我国,司法是采用司法能动主义还是司法克制主义还有些分歧,但是两者并不是非此即彼的问题,只是法官享有多大裁量权问题。在当下中国,法官首先要奉行司法克制主义,法官对法律表示忠诚和谦抑,人民法院要对行政机关和司法机关表示尊重。在此前提下,法官秉持司法能动主义,发挥法官主观能动性和智慧,更加积极主动地回应社会需求,化解社会矛盾和纠纷,实现司法能动与司法克制的动态平衡。
Judicial activism is the hot topic in both theory and practice fields in China because it has different views on adopting judicial activism or judicial restraint, which refers to how much the discretional power a judge can have. In China, based on the judge＇s pursuit of the judicial restraint, royalty and modesty for the law, and the respect of court for the administrative and judicial departments, the judges should uphold judicial activism, develop their subjective initiative and intelligence to the society and solve the social conflicts, therefore, keep the dynamic balance activism and the judicial restraint. meet the demand of between the judicial
出处
《西北师大学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第2期72-76,共5页
Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
