期刊文献+

论全程录音录像制度的科学构建 被引量:48

The Scientific Construction of audio and Video Recording Institution during the Entire Process of Investigation and Interrogation
原文传递
导出
摘要 全程录音录像制度对于规范执法行为,保障犯罪嫌疑人基本权利,促进司法公正具有重要意义。全程录音录像不是单纯意义上的技术性措施,其构建应当放在整个刑事诉讼架构中进行,辅以必要的配套措施,明确违反全程录音录像规定的制裁性后果,合力形成完整的制度体系。在当前的社会发展条件下,全程录音录像制度的构建尚难以"一步到位",仍需循序渐进推行,并在主客观条件具备之时全面实施,切实发挥制度的应有功能。 Having been inspired by the practice and exploration of the public security and judicial organs and drawn sustained attention by the academy of law field, the rule of audio and video recording during the entire procedure of investi- gation and interrogation is gradually recognized by all the communities, which may be probably written into the Amendment to Criminal Procedure Law. This rule is of great significance for adjusting the activities of law enforcement, protecting thefundamental rights of the suspects and promoting justice. Audio and video recording is not just a single technical measure. Iin order to establish this rule, we hall put it into the whole framework of criminal procedure, add some supplementary measures, specify the punishments for violating this rule, and fulfill all the other requirements to form a complete system.Under the present social and economical conditions, it is very difficult to establish the rule of audio and video recording dur- ing the entire procedure of investigation and interrogation in one step, however, we need to gradually promote and practice this rule, and fully enforce it when all the subjective and objective conditions get fulfilled so as to exert all the functions which this rule is supposed to have.
机构地区 最高人民法院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期141-148,共8页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 全程录音录像 证据属性 证据能力 audio and video recording during the entire procedure of investigation and interrogation the characteris-tics of evidence the evidence capacity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1《刑事诉讼法修正案(草案)条文及草案说明》,载中国人大网http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/xinwen/lfgz/2011-08/30/content_1668503.htm,访问时间2011年10月7日. 被引量:3
  • 2黄道秀译..俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法典 新版[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2006:400.
  • 3魏星,程振楠.全程同步录音录像:“逼”出侦查新水平[N].检察日报,2007-09-21. 被引量:1
  • 4王姝.公安部强调命案必破将全力推动命案讯问全程录音录像[N].新京报,2006-05-17. 被引量:1
  • 5瓮怡洁.英国的讯问同步录音录像制度及对我国的启示[J].现代法学,2010,32(3):103-111. 被引量:51
  • 6刘金友主编..证据法学 新编[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:387.
  • 7陈永生.论侦查讯问录音录像制度的保障机制[J].当代法学,2009,23(4):70-81. 被引量:35
  • 8段明学.侦查讯问录音录像制度探析[J].国家检察官学院学报,2007,15(1):108-114. 被引量:28
  • 9主编樊崇义,,顾永忠..侦查讯问程序改革实证研究 侦查讯问中律师在场、录音、录像制度试验[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2007:486页.
  • 10黄东熊著..刑事诉讼法论[M],1999:822.

二级参考文献54

共引文献103

同被引文献479

引证文献48

二级引证文献229

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部