摘要
法院应是人们讲理的场所,法官应该说理,通过说理以增强判决的说服力与可接受性。法官不说理导致判决的可接受性低,当前申诉、上访、执行难等现象就是明证。为此,研究法官说理方法成为加强法官说理必然途径。研究法律解释、法律推理、法律论证等法学方法有助于完善法官说理的方法,有助于从法官说理能力、说理权责、说理激励等方面构建法官说理机制。
The court should be a place for people to reason, the judge should argue in order to make the sentence persuasive and acceptable. Otherwise, the sentence would have a low acceptability, such is a good explanations for the difficulty in complaints, petitions and implementations. Therefore, the study in the arguments of judges becomes a necessary way to strengthen the ability of judges in this field. The study of legal interpretation, legal reasoning, legal argument and other legal methods helps to improve the methods of argument, it is also helpful to build an argument system of the judges in other aspects such as the argument ability, responsibility and incentive.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期88-93,共6页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
法官
说理
方法
说服力
judges
argument
method
persuasive
