期刊文献+

农户金融资产配置的门槛效应对收入差距的影响机制——基于微观面板门限协整模型的经验与证据 被引量:16

An Analysis on the Mechanism of Rural Household Financial Asset Allocation Threshold Effect:Based on Micro-Panel Data Threshold Cointegration Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于2100户农户2005-2009年的微观面板数据,本文构建了农户金融资产配置与收入差距间的两阶段面板门限协整回归,对金融资产配置作用于农户收入差距的机制进行了分析和检验。论文从数理模型上证明了金融资产配置差异对农户收入差距的影响机制;利用非线性门限协整回归的极大似然估计量,本文估计了我国农户金融资产配置与收入差距的两阶段门限模型,并对其模型选择及其门槛效应进行了检验,模型的回归结果及门限参数的变化轨迹证实了金融资产配置的门槛前后农户收入的差异性,农户金融资产配置的差异确实对农户收入产生了重要影响;因此,改善农户金融资产配置的环境及结构可能有助于消减农户间的收入差距。 Based on micro panel data of 2100 rural households through 2005-2009,this paper constructs the two stage threshold cointegration model between the financial assets configuration and the income gap,and deduces the mechanism between them.We establish the mathematical model of the financial asset allocation and the income gap and estimate the two stage threshold cointegration model between Chinese agricultural household financial assets configuration and the income gap via nonlinear threshold cointegration regression maximum likelihood estimator.The regression of the model and the threshold parameters track confirm the threshold of the financial asset allocation and the income difference among the rural households.Thus,to improve the financial asset allocation of rural household environment and structure may help to reduce the income gap between them.
作者 王书华 苏剑
出处 《当代经济科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期16-24,124,共9页 Modern Economic Science
基金 教育部人文社科规划基金项目(项目编号:11YJA790151 09YJA790131) 世界银行山西农村扶贫项目(项目编号:K223001)资助
关键词 门槛效应 门限协整 金融资产配置 收入差距 影响机制 Threshold Effect Threshold Cointegration Financial Assets Configuration Income Gap Impact Mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Kuznets S.Economic growth and income inequality[J].American Economic Review,1955,45(1):23-42. 被引量:1
  • 2King R G,Levine R.Finance and growth:Schumpetermight be right[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1993,108(3):717-737. 被引量:1
  • 3Alesina A,Rodrik D.Distributive politics and economicgrowth[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1994(5):93-110. 被引量:1
  • 4Galor O,Tsidon J.Income distribution and growth:TheKuznets hypothesis revisited[J].Econometica,1996,63:103-117. 被引量:1
  • 5Deininger K,Squire L.New ways of looking at old is-sues:Inequality and growth[J].Journal of DevelopmentEconomics,19985,7(2):103-110. 被引量:1
  • 6Alesina A,Perotti R.Income distribution,political insta-bility and investment[J].World Economic Forum,1996(7):45-53. 被引量:1
  • 7Greenwood J,Jovanovic B.Financial development,growth,and the distribution of income[J].The Journal of PoliticalEconomy,1990,98(5):1076-1107. 被引量:1
  • 8Aghion P,Bolton P.A trickle-down theory of growth anddevelopment with debt overhang[J].Review of Econom-ic Studies,19976,4:151-172. 被引量:1
  • 9Matsuyama K.Financial market globalization and endoge-nous inequality of nations[R].Northwestern University,Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Man-agement Science Discussion Papers,2000,No.1300. 被引量:1
  • 10Beck T,Demirguc-Kunt A,Levine R.Finance,ine-quality and the poor[J].Journal of Economic Growth,2007,12(1):27-49. 被引量:1

二级参考文献69

共引文献859

同被引文献184

引证文献16

二级引证文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部