期刊文献+

国际组织自主性行为研究述评 被引量:1

COMMENT ON THE RESEARCH OF AUTONOMOUS BEHAVIOR OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际组织自主性行为研究的兴起得益于国际制度基础性研究进展以及国际关系理论研究的社会化转向。考察国际组织自主性行为的主要路径有二:一是国家中心主义,二是国际组织中心主义。这两种分析框架对国际组织自主性进行了有益的学理探索,但每一种框架都存在难以克服的缺点,未能对国际组织自主性行为的根源和本质以及其对全球治理的现实意义作出让人满意的学理性解释。如何整合不同的分析框架,更加全面、深刻地认识国际组织自主行为的根源和本质及其对全球治理的现实意义,仍将是国际关系学者的重要研究课题。 The rise of research on autonomous behavior of international organizations was due to the development of basic research on international system and the socialogical turn in theoretic research on international relationship.There are mainly two methods to investigate autonomous behavior of international organizations:one is the state-centrism,the other international organization-centrism.These two analytical frameworks provide a beneficial exploration on the autonomous behavior of international organizations.However,each of them has its inevitable faults,failing to offer a satisfactory explanation of the nature of autonomous behavior of international organizations and its realistic significance in global governance.Therefore,finding out how to integrate the different analytical frameworks,so as to have a deep and comprehensive understanding of the nature of autonomous behavior of international organizations and its realistic significance in global governance is still an important task for researchers on international relationship.
作者 唐纲 韦进深
出处 《西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第1期31-36,10,共6页 Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 国际组织 自主性行为 社会化 国家中心主义 国际组织中心主义 international organization autonomous behavior socialogical turn state-centrism international organization-centrism
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Union of International Association. Yearbook of International Organization 1990 - 91:28th ed [ M ]. Miinchen: K.G. Saur Verlag GmbH & Company,1990:16 -45. 被引量:1
  • 2Kenneth Abbott, Duncan Snidal. Why states act through Formal International Organization [ J ]. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1998,42 ( 1 ) :9. 被引量:1
  • 3Stephen D. Krasner. Structural causes and regime consequences : Regimes as intervening variables [ M 1//Stephen D. Krasner. International regimes. London: Cornell University Press, 1983:2. 被引量:1
  • 4Robert Keohane. International institutions and state Power : Essays in international relations theory [ M ]. Boulder : Westview Press, 1989 : 101 - 125. 被引量:1
  • 5[美]罗伯特·基欧汉.霸权之后:世界政治经济中的合作与纷争[M].苏长和,信强,何曜译,上海:上海人民出版社,2006:12,52. 被引量:4
  • 6Robert Keohane. Multilateralism:An agenda for research [ J]. International Journal, 1990,45 (4) : 731 - 764. 被引量:1
  • 7John Ruggie. Multilateralism:the anatomy of an institution [J]. International Organization,1992,46(3) :561 -598. 被引量:1
  • 8Judith Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert Keohane, Anne - Marie Slaughter. Introduction:legalization and world politics[ J ]. International Organization, 2000,54 ( 3 ) : 385 - 399. 被引量:1
  • 9Kenneth Abbott, Duncan Snidal. Hard and soft law in in- ternational governance [ J ]. International Organization, 2000,54 (3) :421 - 456. 被引量:1
  • 10Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lopson, Duncan Snidal. The rational design of international institutions [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press,2003:761 - 799. 被引量:1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Robert Cox ,Harold Jacobson. The Autonomy of Influence:Decision Making in International Organization [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973. 被引量:1
  • 2[美]爱德华·勒克.美国政治与国际组织[M],裘因,等译.北京:新华出版社,2001. 被引量:1
  • 3Kenneth Shepsle, Barry Weingast.The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power [J]. American Political Science Review, Vol. 81,No.1 (1987). 被引量:1
  • 4Avinash Dixit, Gene Grossman, and Elhanan Helpman.Common Agency and Coordination: General Theory and Application to Governmental Policy Making [J]. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105, No. 4(1997). 被引量:1
  • 5Mark Thatcher, Stone Sweet. Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non-Majoritarian Institutions[J]. West European Politics, Vol. 25, No. 1 (2002). 被引量:1
  • 6Kenneth Abbott, Duncan Snidal .Why States Act through Formal International Organizations [J]. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 42, No. 1(1998). 被引量:1
  • 7Lisa Martin. Coercive Cooperation, Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. 被引量:1
  • 8Andrew Cortell , James Davis. How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms [J]. International Studies Quarterly, Vol.40, No. 4 (1996). 被引量:1
  • 9Mark Pollack. Learning from the Americanists: Theory and Method in the Study of Delegation [J]. West European Politics, Vol. 25, No. 1(2002). 被引量:1
  • 10Mark Pollack.Delegation,Agency and Agenda-setting in the European Community [J]. International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 1(1997). 被引量:1

共引文献157

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部