期刊文献+

初中生个人认识论发展特点及家庭影响因素 被引量:1

The Development of Middle School Students' Personal Epistemology and Its Familial Influencing Factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用中学生反省判断问卷,调查了617名初中生的个人认识论发展特点,结果发现:(1)初中生对知识确定性认识最好,对表征多元认识最差,五个维度上的平均得分差异显著。(2)不同年级和性别的初中生个人认识论水平具有显著差异。年级越高,认识水平越好;在知识的简单性维度上,女生的表现显著好于男生;在表征多元维度上,男生的表现显著好于女生。(3)初中生个人认识论与父母受教育水平之间相关不显著。 Based on the Reflective Judgment Model,617 middle school students at grade 7,8,10 completed the Reflective Judgment Questionnaire for middle school student.Results showed:(1) The dimension of certainty got the highest score,and the dimension of multi-representation got the lowest score.Significant differences were found among the five dimensions.(2) Significant differences were found among different grade and gender.The grade is higher,the better of the level of personal epistemology.On the complexity dimension,performance of female students were outstanding than their male partners.On the multi-presentation dimension,performance of male students were outstanding than their female partners.(3) Significant relationships were not found among middle school students' personal epistemology and their parents' educational level.
出处 《心理研究》 2012年第1期78-84,共7页 Psychological Research
基金 中山大学人文社会科学青年研究基金项目(16000-3171917) 广东省教育科研"十一五"规划2010年度研究项目(2010tjk441)
关键词 个人认识论 发展特点 初中生 父母受教育水平 personal epistemology developmental characteristics middle school student parents' educational level
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献46

共引文献157

同被引文献18

  • 1黄朝宾.民族院校少数民族学生与汉族学生学习心理差异及教育策略探索[J].贵州民族研究,2004,24(2):171-175. 被引量:11
  • 2Schommer M,Easter M. Epistemological beliefs'contribu- tions to study strategies of Asian Americans and European Americans[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,2008,(04):920-929. 被引量:1
  • 3Buehl M.M. Assessing the multidimensionality of students'epistemic beliefs across diverse cultures[A].New York:springer-verlag,2008.65-112. 被引量:1
  • 4Hofer B.K. Epistemological Understanding as a Meta- cognitive Process:Thinking About During Online Search- ing[J].Educational Psychologist,2004,(01):43-55. 被引量:1
  • 5Ryan M.P. Monitoring text comprehension:Individual differences in epistemological standards[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,1984.248-258. 被引量:1
  • 6Schommer M. An emerging conceptualization of episte- mological beliefs and their role in learning[A].Hillsdale NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum As- sociates,Inc,1994.25-40. 被引量:1
  • 7Conley,A.M,Pintrich,P.R,Vekiri,I,Harrison,D. Chan- ges in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students[J].Contemporary Educational Psychology,2004,(29). 被引量:1
  • 8Dale J.L. Reflective judgment:Seminarians' epistemolo- gy in a world of relativism[J].Journal of Psychology and Theology,2005,(01):56-64. 被引量:1
  • 9Baxter Magolda M B. Evolution of a constructivist con- ceptualization of epistemologlcal reflection ~ J ~[J].Educa- tional Psychologist,2004,(01):31-42. 被引量:1
  • 10Chan K,Elliot R.G. Exploratory study of Hong Kong teacher education students" epistemological beliefs :Cul- tural perspectives and implications on beliefs research[J].Contemporary Educational Psychology,2003,(03):392-4.15. 被引量:1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部