摘要
科学哲学如今有两种典型的对立倾向:自然主义和理性主义。文章在梳理、比较当代美国著名哲学家蒯因、普特南和哈克相关的核心观点的基础上,指出科学哲学中的自然主义和理性主义并非格格不入,虽然自然化认识论不再明确使用辩护、合理的理由等概念,但它没有绝对抛弃规范性;相反,它是在遵循传统认识论的某些规范的基础上,秉持逻辑主义的精神侧重描述的方式发展着哲学之未竟事业。
Philosophy of science has two typical opposite dispositions： naturalism and rationalism.On the basis of sorting out and comparing the correlative kernel viewpoint among the contemporary American famous philosophers Quine,Putnam and Haack,the paper states that naturalism in philosophy of science does not have nothing to do with rationalism,and although naturalized epistemology does not apparently use the concepts of justification,reason,etc.no longer,it does not radically abandon normativity;on the contrary,based on some norms of traditional epistemology,it insists on the way of description of a spirit of logicalism in the development of the enterprise of philosophy.
出处
《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2011年第4期94-97,共4页
Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(DUT10RW203)
关键词
认识论
规范性
自然化
辩护
证据
epistemology
normativity
naturalization
justification
evidence
