摘要
生物目的论的自然化是以自然科学为依据,在自然秩序中为生物目的找到其位置。生物目的论的主流解释方案是通过自然选择的术语来展开。选择论者认为,生物性状的目的由自然选择而来。近几年,组织论作为一个新的哲学观点日益突显。组织论者认为,生物有机体的目的是维持它们所构成的系统组织。无论是选择论还是组织论,其自然化方案都面临着一些反例。但这些反例并不能对选择论和组织论构成实质性的威胁,选择论和组织论在自然主义的框架中可以和谐共存。
The naturalization of biological teleology is based on natural science to find its place in the natural order for biological purposes.The dominant explanation of biological teleology is through the terms of natural selection.Selectionists believe that the purpose of biological traits stems from natural selection in Darwinian evolution.In recent years,organization theory,as a new philosophical viewpoint,has become increasingly prominent.According to the organizational accounts,the purpose of living organisms is the maintenance of the organization of the systems they constitute.The naturalization approaches of both selection and organization theory face some possible counterexamples.But we argue that these counterexamples can not pose a substantial threat to selection and organization theory,and on the contrary these two theories can coexist harmoniously in a naturalistic framework.
作者
刘晓青
于小晶
LIU Xiaoqing;YU Xiaojing(School of Marxism,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine;Department of Philosophy,Party School of the Central Committee of the C.P.C.)
出处
《当代中国价值观研究》
2022年第1期99-108,共10页
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“人类心智进化的哲学研究”(18BZX046)的阶段性成果
关键词
生物目的论
自然化
选择论
组织论
合理性辩护
biological teleology
naturalizing
selection theory
organization theory
defense of reasonableness
