摘要
吊文可分为吊古类吊文和吊丧类吊文,前者通过哀悼古人以自喻抒怀,后者对同时人的死亡表达悲伤。"自喻"是吊古类吊文与吊丧类吊文及其他几种哀祭类文体相区别的典型特征。《文心雕龙》与《文选》分别评录了吊文一体,表现出较为一致的看法,即皆重吊古类吊文,吊丧类吊文在二书中均处于缺失状态。这种缺失在《文心雕龙》是出于辨体的需要,乃是刘勰对吊文一体的刻意规范;在《文选》则是编者优胜劣汰的结果。刘勰与萧统皆推重贾谊《吊屈原文》,乃因此作不论在内容上,还是形式上都对后世吊文起到了立训垂范的作用。
According to different writing purpose, elegy essays can be divided into two types ： those mourning the ancients and those mourning the passing of contemporary people. The former expresses the author＇s feelings and aspiration by mourning the ancients. The latter expresses personal sadness about the death of coevals. ＂Self elegy＂ is a typical feature of the former type distinguishing it from the latter as well as other styles of elegy essays. Both Wen Xin Diao Long and Wen Xuan show more identity of views on elegy essays, both attaching importance to essays mourning the ancients and the essays mourning contemporary people do not appear in these two books. Liu Xie＇s deliberate specification of elegy essay style led to the missing of the latter type in Wen Xin Diao Long. The reason why Wen Xuan did not include the latter is the result of survival of the fittest. Both Liu Xie and Xiao Tong praised highly of Jia Yi＇s ＂Diao Qi Yuan Wen＂, because this essay was considered a model of elegy both in content and form.
出处
《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2011年第6期54-58,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
2010年度河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(项目批准号:2010FWX019)
关键词
文心雕龙
文选
吊文
吊古类吊文
吊丧类吊文
Wen Xin Diao Long
Wen Xuan
elegy essays
essays mourning the ancients
essays mourning contemporary people
