期刊文献+

基于经济与排放效益的混合动力和纯电动公交车发展前景分析 被引量:24

Prospect Analysis for Hybrid Electric and Battery Electric City Buses Based on Lifecycle Cost and Emission
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以混合动力和纯电动公交车为研究对象,基于购置成本和使用成本构建全生命周期成本模型,利用GREET模型分析"油井到车轮"二氧化碳排放量,并与传统柴油公交车对比,分析50万公里名义寿命周期内乐观和保守两种情景下新能源公交车的发展前景。结果表明:在乐观情景下,纯电动公交车拥有最优的生命周期成本和二氧化碳减排量,较柴油车分别低37%和35%;在保守情景下,混合动力公交车拥有与柴油公交车持平的生命周期成本及较低的二氧化碳排放量,较同时期柴油车低30%,纯电动公交车的生命周期成本则远高于柴油车。未来10年混合动力公交车具备良好的应用前景,纯电动公交车则需要电源结构优化和电池技术突破之后才能显示较强的竞争力。 The authors took hybrid electric bus and battery electric bus as research subjects,built lifecycle cost model based on acquisition cost and using cost,calculated Well-to-Wheel carbon dioxide emission based on GREET model,analyzed foreground of new energy buses in aggressive scenario and conservative scenario compared with conventional diesel bus with 5×105km nominal lifecycle.According to the result,in the aggressive scenario,battery electric bus will obtain signally lifecycle cost and emission advantage,37% and 35% lower than diesel bus.While in the conservative scenario,hybrid electric bus will obtain reasonable emission advantage,30% lower than diesel bus and lifecycle cost is as much as diesel bus,but battery electric bus will have markedly lifecycle cost disadvantage.In the future 10 years,hybrid electric bus will have a better prospect,while battery electric bus requires power structure optimization and battery technology breakthroughs to display its competitiveness.
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期57-65,共9页 China Soft Science
基金 上海市科技发展基金软科学研究项目(11692103800) 上汽教育基金(2010ZCYJ03-A)
关键词 新能源公交车 混合动力 纯电动 生命周期成本 二氧化碳排放 new energy bus hybrid vehicle electric vehicle lifecycle cost carbon dioxide emission
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Patrick Moriarty, Damon Honnery. The Prospects for Global Green Car Mobility [ J ]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, (16) :17171726. 被引量:1
  • 2Mikhail Granovskii, Ibrahim Dincer, Marc A. Rosen. Economic and Environmental Comparison of Conventional, Hybrid, Electric and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles [J]. Joumal of Power Sources,2006, (159) :1186-1193. 被引量:1
  • 3Reinhart Ktlhne. Electric Buses-An Energy Efficient Urban Transportation Means[J]. Energy ,2010, (35) :4510 -4513. 被引量:1
  • 4M. J. Kellaway. Hybrid Buses-What Their Batteries Real ly Need to Do[J]. Journal of Power Sources,2007, (168) 95-98. 被引量:1
  • 5Michael Fischer, Mathew Werber, Peter V. Schwartz. Batteries: Higher Energy Density Than Gasoline? [ J ]. Energy Policy ,2009, ( 37 ) :2639-2641. 被引量:1
  • 6Deutsche Bank Auto Team,Industry Discussions and Private Interviews [ R ]. 2010. 被引量:1
  • 7Jonas Hellgren. Life Cycle Cost Analysis of A Car,A City Bus and An Intercity Bus Powertrain for Year 2005 and 2020 [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2007, ( 35 ) :39-49. 被引量:1
  • 8朱莺.天然气发电与燃煤发电环保价值比较及政策建议[J].兰州学刊,2010(12):61-63. 被引量:1
  • 9Andreas Scha fer, John B. Heywood, Malcolm A. Weiss. Future Fuel Cell and Internal Combustion Engine Automobile Technologies:A 25 -year Life Cycle and Fleet Impact Assessment [ J ]. Energy,2006, (31 ) :2064-2087. 被引量:1
  • 10UC Davis Plugin Hybrid & Electric Vehicle Research Center,Restructuring the Cost of Automotive Batteries [R]. 2010. 被引量:1

二级参考文献11

共引文献36

同被引文献192

引证文献24

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部