期刊文献+

上海市水灾风险分析 被引量:3

Risk analysis of flood disaster in Shanghai Municipality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用1949-1990年上海市郊水灾历史灾情资料,分析其时空分布特征显示,自1949年以来,水灾受灾指数和相应粮食减产率呈阶段性下降,尤其自1977年水利控制片贯彻实施后,二者呈大幅度下降。各区县中,综合考虑水灾频次和受灾面积两个因素,得出南汇灾情最为严峻。最终,针对历史灾情资料缺乏、小样本数据使用传统统计模型进行风险分析精度不高的特点,基于信息扩散原理,利用正态信息扩散技术将单一的样本观测值变为一模糊集的模糊数学方法,对各区县受灾指数进行了风险分析,结果显示:南汇、浦东在受灾指数较低时,超越概率较高,即风险较高;崇明、金山在任一受灾指数下,风险都显示最高,受灾指数达0.8的超越概率为0.03345和0.01243,分别达到30年一遇和100年一遇。 This paper analyzes spatiotemporal distribution of flood disaster in suburb of shanghai Municipality according to the historical data from 1949 to 1990.Since planning for water resources development carried out in 1979,the index of area damaged by flood disaster has decreased significantly.In all districts and counties of the municipality,considering two factors of flood disaster frequency ratio and area ratio,Nanhui District is the highest.Because the historical data of flood disaster is not enough to be used for analysing the probability distribution,the information diffusion method was introduced to change single sample observations into fuzzy sets,and a quantitatively analyzing model of flood disaster risk was proposed.The results show that the flood disaster risk assessment values are higher in Nanhui District and Pudong District when the index of area damaged by flood disaster is lower,However,the flood disaster risk assessment values in Chongming,Jinshan are always high in any case.When the index reaches 0.8,the exceedance probability are 0.03345 and 0.01243,corresponding to 30-year return period and 50-year return period respectively.
出处 《自然灾害学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期94-98,共5页 Journal of Natural Disasters
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(40730526) 上海市重大科技攻关项目(05DZ12007)
关键词 水灾 信息扩散 风险分析 农业 上海市 flood disaster information diffusion risk analysis agriculture Shanghai Municipality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献97

共引文献359

同被引文献47

  • 1刘荆,蒋卫国,杜培军,盛绍学,刘家福,曹入尹.基于相关分析的淮河流域暴雨灾害风险评估[J].中国矿业大学学报,2009,38(5):735-740. 被引量:24
  • 2唐川,朱静.基于GIS的山洪灾害风险区划[J].地理学报,2005,60(1):87-94. 被引量:204
  • 3马宗伟,许有鹏,李嘉峻.河流形态的分维及与洪水关系的探讨——以长江中下游为例[J].水科学进展,2005,16(4):530-534. 被引量:51
  • 4黄民生,黄呈橙.洪灾风险评价等级模型探讨[J].灾害学,2007,22(1):1-5. 被引量:30
  • 5Aynsley R M. Politics of pedestrian level urban wind control [ J ]. Building and Environment, 1989, 24 (4) : 291 -295. 被引量:1
  • 6Baker C J. Assessment of urban wind problems and synthesis of results. In COST Action C14 Impact of Wind and Storm in City Life and Built Environment [ C ]//In J. P. A. J. van Beeck (ed.). Proceedings of the International Conference on Urban Wind Engineering and Building Aerodynamics. Von Karman Institute of Fluid Mechanics. 2004 : A1.1 - A1.6. 被引量:1
  • 7Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, et al. AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings [ J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96( 10/11 ) : 1749 -1761. 被引量:1
  • 8Launder B E, Spalding D B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows [ J ]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1974, 3(2) : 269 -289. 被引量:1
  • 9Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Canneliet J. CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems [ J ]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41 (2): 238-252. 被引量:1
  • 10Fang P Z, Gu M, Tan J G, et al. Modeling the neutral atmospheric boundary layer based on the standard k - ε turbulent model: modified wall function [ C]. Proceedings of the 7th Asia - Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering. Taiwan. 2009 : 933 -936. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部