摘要
2009年12月26日通过的《侵权责任法》明确规定在同一事故中可不考虑个人差异,以同一数额确定死亡赔偿金。该条"同命同价"条款引起社会各界的广泛关注。死亡赔偿并不是对死者生命价值的赔偿,而是对死者近亲属受损利益的救济。死亡赔偿从"扶养丧失说"改采"继承丧失说",赔偿标准采定型化赔偿和客观计算,体现了立法没有为了逻辑自治而漠视社会现实,但对城乡居民采用了两分法的计算标准,显然违背了死亡赔偿金设立的初衷。今后死亡赔偿金制度的完善必然取决于对有关利弊的实证分析而非抽象的逻辑推理。
December 26, 2009 adopted the ＂Tort Liability Act＂, defined in the same accident from time to consider individual differences in order to determine the same amount of death compensation. Which ＂with life the same price＂ clause aroused extensive attention. In fact, the bereavement damage is a kind of remedies for the interests of the deceased＇ s kinsfolk rather than compensations for the value of the deceased＇ s life. The transfer from ＂loss - to- the- survivors＇to ＂loss - to - the - inheritors＇as well as the adherence to compensation criteria of stereotypes and objective calculation have manifested that leg- islation didn＇t ignore the social reality for the purpose of logical autonomy. However, the adopting of a dichotomous method on citizens living in the city and countryside apparently deviates from the original in- tention of setting bereavement damages. From then onward, the complement of bereavement damage sys- tem would be determined by the empirical analysis on merits and demerits concemed instead of abstract logical reasoning.
出处
《南京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第12期92-98,共7页
Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
死亡赔偿金
扶养丧失说
继承丧失说
定额赔偿
bereavement damages
the theory of ＂loss - to - the - survivors＂
the theory of ＂loss -to- the- inheritors＂
fixed- amount compensation
