摘要
平等权利说、平等原则说和平等混合说都无法完全实现平等的宪法功能,需要以功能主义视角重塑平等的合宪性审查。对自由权领域的审查,平等作为宪法原则发挥审查方法和保护下限的功能;对社会权领域的审查,平等作为权利为审查提供请求权基础。在大多数情况下社会权都无法接受审查,但当社会权涉及国家资源分配的给付时,可例外地通过平等权转致而接受合宪性审查。2020年备案审查报告中提到的“同命不同价”文件不构成对公民平等权的侵犯,但违反平等原则将构成对公民的人格尊严权的侵犯。
The doctrine of equal right,the principle of equality and the doctrine of mixed rights cannot fully realize the constitutional function of equality,and it is necessary to reshape the constitutional review of equality from a functionalism perspective.In the examination of liberty rights,equality as a constitutional principle plays the function of examination method and protection of the lower limit;in the examination of social rights,equality as a right provides the basis for the review of the right to claim.In most cases,social rights cannot be examined,but when social rights relate to the payment of state resource allocations,they may be subject to constitutional review through the transfer of equal right as an exception.The“same life and different price”documents mentioned in the 2020 record-keeping for review report does not constitute a violation of citizens'right to equality,but violates the principle of equality and constitutes an infringement of citizens'right to personal dignity.
出处
《人权研究（辑刊）》
2023年第2期277-298,358,共23页
Journal of Human Rights
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国征收法的体系化研究”(21AFX006)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
平等权
平等原则
社会权
同命不同价
合宪性审查
Equal Right
The Principle of Equality
Social Rights
Same Life and Different Price
Constitutional Review
