期刊文献+

颈丛复合瑞芬太尼全麻用于颈动脉内膜剥脱术的临床研究 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察颈丛复合瑞芬太尼全麻对颈动脉内膜剥脱术的血流动力学的影响。方法将2009-03-2011-04我院行颈动脉内膜剥脱术的100例患者按照麻醉方式分为两组,对照组50例采用静脉全麻,观察组50例采用颈丛复合瑞芬全麻。比较并分析两组切皮时(T1)、动脉剥离时(T2)、缝皮时(T3)、术后6h(T4)的SBP(HR)的血流动力学波动情况;统计术中瑞芬太尼用量,术后芬太尼用量及苏醒时间。结果颈丛+全麻组患者在各时点HR、SBP的波动均明显小于全麻组(P<0.05);全麻组苏醒时间、镇痛药用量显著高于复合组(P<0.05)。结论颈丛复合瑞芬全麻在CEA麻醉中对血流动力学影响小,苏醒时间短,镇痛药用量少,临床效果满意,能明显提高麻醉安全和质量。
出处 《中国误诊学杂志》 CAS 2011年第34期8398-8399,共2页 Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1朱宇麟,景桂霞,朱耀民,谭敬,高燕凤,李小刚,申新.全麻和颈丛阻滞行颈动脉内膜剥脱术的对比研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(7):402-404. 被引量:5
  • 2European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0- 29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet,1991,337(8752):1235-1243. 被引量:1
  • 3Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M. Barr HWy et al. The North Ameriban symptomatib Barotid Endarterebtomy Trial: Surgibal Results in 1415 Patients. Stroke, 1999,30 : 1751-1758. 被引量:1
  • 4Ozkose Z,Yalbin Bok O, Tunber B,et al. Bomparison of hemodynamibs, rebovery profile, and early postoperative pain bontrol and bosts of remifentanil versus alfentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia(TIVA). J Blin Anesth, 2002, 14: 161- 168. 被引量:1
  • 5Twersky RS, J amerson B, Warner DS, et al. Hemodynamibs and emergenbe profile of remifentanil versus fentanyl prospebtively bompared in a large population of surgibal patients. J Blin Anesth, 2001,13 : 407-416. 被引量:1
  • 6Lineberger BK, Lubarsky DA. Anesthesia for barotid endarterebtomy. Burr Opinion Anesthesiology,1998,11:479-484. 被引量:1
  • 7Stoneham MD, Knighton JD. Regional anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Br J Anaesth, 1999,82:910-919. 被引量:1
  • 8Zvara DA. Regional anesthesia is the best technique for carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1998,12:111-114. 被引量:1
  • 9Lineberger CK, Lubarsky DA. General anesthesia and regional anesthesia are equally acceptable choices for carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1998,12: 115-117. 被引量:1
  • 10Fiorani P, Sbarigia E, Speziale F, et al. General anaesthesia versus cervica 1 block and perioperative complications in carotid artery surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 1997,13: 37-42. 被引量:1

共引文献8

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部