摘要
目的:比较耳穴贴压与常规西医综合疗法治疗儿童弱视的疗效差异。方法:将230例弱视患儿随机分为两组,耳压组120例(212眼)采用王不留行籽贴压耳穴眼、神门、肝、脾、肾等治疗,综合组110例(194眼)运用西医常规综合疗法治疗,包括遮盖法、配镜矫正及家庭精细作业训练。分别观察两组患儿视力改善情况,并随访3年。结果:屈光不正性弱视耳压组、综合组有效率分别为81.0%(64/79)、52.2%(36/69);屈光参差性弱视耳压组、综合组有效率分别为73.1%(49/67)、47.7%(31/65);斜视性弱视耳压组、综合组有效率分别为71.2%(47/66)、45.0%(27/60),各类型弱视耳压组的疗效均优于综合组(均P<0.05)。结论:耳穴贴压治疗儿童弱视疗效优于西医常规综合疗法,可明显改善患儿的视力情况,且操作简便。
Objective To compare the differences in the therapeutic effect on child arnblyopia between auricular point sticking therapy and routine complex treatment. Methods Two hundreds and thirty cases of amblyopia were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 120 cases （212 eyes） were in the observation group and 110 cases （194 eyes） were in the control group. The observation group was treated with auricular point sticking therapy. The main points were Yan （eye）, Sbenmen, Gan （liver）, Pi （spleen） and Shen （kidney）, etc. The control group was treated with routine complex treatment, sucb as wearing glasses, shade therapy and family refined performance therapy. The changes of vision were observed after treatment in the two groups. The follow-up was 3 years. Results The effective rate was 81.0%（64/79） in the observation group of ametropic amblyopia and 52.2 % （36/69） in the control group. The effective rate was 73. 1 % （,19/67） in the observation group of anisometropic amblyopia and 47. 7% （31/65） in the control group. The effective rate was 71.2% （47/66） in the observation group of strabismic amblyopia and 45.0% （27/60） in the control group. Tbe therapeutic effect of the observation group was superior to that of the control group （all P〈0.05）. Conclusion Auricular point sticking therapy can obviously improve child visual acuity with simple manipulation.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第12期1081-1083,共3页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
关键词
弱视
儿童
耳穴贴压
王不留行
对比研究
Amblyopia, Child
Auricular Point Stickinging, Semen Vaccariae
Comparative Study
