摘要
电镜对临床外检标本做超微病理诊断的价值报道不一,作者选择临床外检中疑难病例103例进行了分析研究。结果:有确诊价值的40例(38.8%);有证实价值的49例(48.20%);诊断失败14例(13%)。作者认为,电镜诊断外检标本的价值大小与病例选择、标本来源等诸多方面因素有关。
Application and value of ultrastructural pathologic diagnosis in surgical biopsy were
variously reported,therefore 103 difficult cases were selected and the diagnostic TEM was employed to
study it. Pathologic diagnosis were finally made by diagnostic TEM in 41 cases (40%), which could not
be diagnosed by light microscopy alone. Light microscopic diagnosis were confirmed by diagnostic TEM in
48 cases(47 %). Pathologic diagnosis could not be performed in 14 cases (13 %), because the biopsy
was not immediately and suitablly fixed, not carefully processed, not kept in a fresh state, et cetera. The
authors think that transmission electron microsopic dignosis are closely related to selected cases,source
of specimen, etc.
出处
《承德医学院学报》
1993年第3期179-181,共3页
Journal of Chengde Medical University
