摘要
我国刑法在规定司法机关对犯罪人追究刑事责任有效期限的同时,用时效中断、时效延长对追诉时效进行补充,建立了比较完善的体系。由于理论和实践对追诉时效与刑事诉讼程序之间的关系缺乏必要的关注,极少反思案件进入刑事诉讼程序后追诉时效是否继续发挥作用。本文在比较法的视野下,对追诉时效与刑事诉讼程序的关系进行尝试性的厘定,得出我国刑法追诉时效存在的缺陷,为了填补该缺陷而建议在刑法中创设追诉时效中止制度。
China＇s criminal law requires the valid time of criminal responsibility. At the same time, it uses the interruption of prescription and the extension of limitation to make up the limitation of prosecution; therefore, it constructs a relatively perfect system. Due to the lack of necessity between theory and the relation of the valid time of criminal responsibility and criminal procedure, people rarely rethink whether the case brings the function after it enters into the stage of limitation of prosecution of criminal procedure. Under the view of comparative method, this article makes the regulation of the relation of limitation of prosecution and criminal procedure, and it gets the shortcomings of the limitation of prosecution and build up the system of making limitation of prosecution.
出处
《重庆文理学院学报（社会科学版）》
2011年第6期106-109,共4页
Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences（Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
追诉时效
刑事诉讼程序
时效延长
时效中止
limitation of prosecution
criminal procedure
the extension of valid time
suspension of prescription
