期刊文献+

腹腔镜保留肾单位术治疗肾癌临床研究 被引量:4

Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价腹腔镜保留肾单位术治疗肾癌的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析我院2005年1月~2008年1月肾癌患者49例,腹腔镜保留肾单位术(LNSS)治疗29例,腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗(LRN)20例。结果:LNSS组和LRN组的平均热缺血时间和住院天数比较差异显著(P<0.05),而手术时间、术中出血量和术后3d的引流量等无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组在局部复发、远处转移和3年无瘤生存率等方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。术后随访,LNSS组:因肿瘤远处转移而致死1例,非肿瘤致死2例;LRN组:因肿瘤局部复发而致死1例,非肿瘤致死3例,肾功能不全1例。结论:腹腔镜保留肾单位术治疗肾癌安全可靠,短期随访效果较好。 Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-spar- ing surgery (LNSS) on renal tumors. Methods: a retrospective analysis of 49 cases with confirmed kidney cancer in our hospital from January 2005-January 2008 were performed, including 29 cases with LNSS and 20 cases with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) treatment. Results: There was significant differ- ence in mean warm ischemia time between LNSS group and LRN group (P〈0.05), but no significant difference in operation time, mid-operative bleeding volum and drainage volum 3 clays after surgery etc (P 〈0.05). There was either no significant difference in local recurrence, incidence of distant metastasis, and 3 years disease-free survival rate (P〈0.05). Follow-up showed 1 case died of distant metastasis, and 2 cases died of non-tumor cause in LNSS group; while 1 cases of local recurrence, 3 cases of non-tumor cause, and 1 case of renal insufficiency in LRN group. Conclusions: LNSS is safe and reliable, and of short-term effect.
作者 覃永佳
出处 《海南医学院学报》 CAS 2011年第11期1516-1518,共3页 Journal of Hainan Medical University
基金 海南医学院科研基金资助学报项目(0020110418)~~
关键词 肾癌 腹腔镜保留肾单位术 腹腔镜根治性肾切除术 Kidney cancer LNSS Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献22

  • 1Hricak H,Thoeni RF,Carroll PR,et al.Dectetion and staging of renal neoplasms:a reassessment of MR imaging[J].Radiology,1988,166:643-649. 被引量:1
  • 2Ljungberg B.Nephron-sparing surgery-strategies for partial nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma[J].J Surg,2004,93:126-131. 被引量:1
  • 3Manikandan R,Srinivasan V,Rane A,et al.Which is the real gold standard for small volume renal tumors?Radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery[J].Endourol,2004,18(1):39-44. 被引量:1
  • 4Fergany AF,Hafez KS,Novick AC.Long-term results of nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma:10-years follow-up[J].J Urol,2000,163:442-445. 被引量:1
  • 5Adkins KL,Chang SS,Cookson MS,et al.Partial nephrectomy safely preserves renal function in patient with a solitary kidney[J].J Urol,2003,169:79-81. 被引量:1
  • 6Miller J,Fischer C,Freese R,et al. Nephron sparingsurgery for renal cell carcinoma - is tumor size a suitable parameter for indication? Urology, 1999, 54:988. 被引量:1
  • 7Novick AC, Zincke H, Neves R J, et al. Surgical enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 1986,135 (2): 235. 被引量:1
  • 8Marshall F F, Taxy J B, Fishman E K, et al. The feasibility of surgical enucleation for renal cell carcinoma.J Uro1,1986,135(2):231. 被引量:1
  • 9Darmiento M , Damiano R, Feleppa B, et al .Elective conservative surgery for renal carcinoma versus radical nephrectomy:a prospective study. Br J Urol, 1997,79: 15. 被引量:1
  • 10Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, et al. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc,2000,75: 1236. 被引量:1

共引文献6

同被引文献52

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部