期刊文献+

北极地区200海里外大陆架划界法律问题研究 被引量:10

ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL ISSUES OF DELIMITING THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE ARCTIC CONTINENTAL SHELF BEYOND 200 NAUTICAL MILES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着北极冰盖的融化,开采北极蕴藏丰富的石油、矿产资源越来越具有现实可行性,北极地区200海里外大陆架划界问题日益成为各国关注的热点。分析北极地区200海里外大陆架划界的国际法基础、主要法律问题以及学界对解决该问题的建议,认为200海里外大陆架划界不可能通过某一特定程序一次性解决,而是现有国际法框架内各国共同参与、区分不同阶段、依次解决多个问题的综合过程。北极地区200海里外大陆架问题不仅仅是地区事务,也同非北极国家切身利益息息相关。中国应当加强该问题的研究,以期作出积极、适当的反应。 As the Arctic ice cap is melting rapidly, it will be technically possible in the near future for Arctic coastal countries (Russia, Denmark, Norway, Canada and the United States) to exploit the natural resources hidden in the Arctic region. The delimitation of the continental shelf in the Arctic will be a complicated procedure because of a number of factors: the geological structure of the Arctic continental shelf; the non-legally binding recommendation of the Commission on the limits of the Continental Shelf; the defects in the UNCLOS dispute settlement mechanism; and the fragile Arctic environment system. This article will focus largely on treaty law, legal issues, and a settlement model of the delimitation of the Arctic outer continental shelf. Arctic outer continental shelf issues are not only regional affairs, but are also closely related to China' s vital interests. To ensure China's sustainable and stable economic development, we should pay greater attention to legal rights regarding the natural resources of the sea. China is expected to influence the final settlement of the Arctic outer continental shelf via active and stable legal methods to safeguard its own legitimate interests.
作者 吴迪
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《极地研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期217-225,共9页 Chinese Journal of Polar Research
基金 中国极地研究中心联合项目"中国与北极相关国际组织之间的关系分析"(项目编号:NBQY200904)资助
关键词 北极 200海里外大陆架 联合国海洋法公约 大陆架界限委员会 解决模式 Arctic, the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles, UNCLOS, CLCS, settlement model
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1The Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research. Climate and Ecosystem of the Arctic Ocean, 2007. http://www, eurekalert, org/pub_ releases/2007-09/awif-tsi091307, php. 被引量:1
  • 2Matin R. Arctic sovereignty: Cold facts, hot issues: melting ice and heated conflicts: a multilateral treaty as a preferable settlement for the Arctic territorial dispute. Southwestern Journal of International Law, 2009, 15 : 419-448. 被引量:1
  • 3BBC News. Russia Ahead in Arctic "Gold Rush", 2007. http://news, bbc. co. uk/ 2/ hi/ 6925853. stm. 被引量:1
  • 4The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. Submissions to the CLCS, 2010. http ://www. un. org/Depts/los/clcs_new/commission submissions, htm. 被引量:1
  • 5Jacqulyn C. What lies beneath : the CLCS and the race to lay claim over the Arctic seabed. Environmental & Energy Law & Policy Journal, 2008, 3 : 149--157. 被引量:1
  • 6Norwegian Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Continental Shelf Submission of Norway in Respect of Areas in the Arctic Ocean, the Barents Sea and the Norwegian Sea, 2006. http ://www. un. org/Depts/lo s/clcs_new/submissions_files/nor06/ nor_exec_sum, pdf. 被引量:1
  • 7The Secretary-General. Oceans and the Law of the Sea: Report of the Secretary General, 2002. U.N. Doc. A/57/57/Add. 1. 被引量:1
  • 8Permanent Mission of Iceland to the United Nation. Compliments to Kingdom and Denmark' s Submission to the CLCS, 2009. http ://www. un. org/ Depts/los/eles_new/submissions_files/dnk28_09/isl_l 5 jun09, pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9Rebecca M B. Arctic sovereignty: cold facts, hot issues: human rights and Arctic resources. Southwestern Journal of International Law, 2009, 15 : 251--282. 被引量:1
  • 10Myron H N, John N M, Tomas H H. Legal and scientific aspects of continental shelf limits. Martinus Nijhoff, 2004, C: 100-115, 189--195. 被引量:1

二级参考文献7

  • 1《联合国海洋法公约》第82条. 被引量:1
  • 2俄罗斯插旗引爆"北极争夺战"[N].参考消息,2007-08-04(1). 被引量:1
  • 3Verhaag,Melissa A.It is not too late:the need for a comprehensive international treaty to protect the Arctic environment[J],Geo rgetown International Environmental Law Review,2002,(15):555-579. 被引量:1
  • 4Koivurova,Timo.Environmental Protection in the Arctic and Antarctic:Can the Polar Regimes Learn from Each Other?[J],International Journal of Legal Information,2005,(33):204-210. 被引量:1
  • 5Mark Jarashow,Michael B.Runnels,& Tait Svenson.UNCLOS and the ARCTIC:the Path of Least Resistance[J],Fordham International Law Journal,2007,(30):1587-1652. 被引量:1
  • 6吴慧.“北极争夺战”的国际法分析[J].国际关系学院学报,2007(5):36-42. 被引量:38
  • 7王秀英.国际法视阈中的北极争端[J].海洋开发与管理,2007,24(6):14-19. 被引量:11

共引文献20

同被引文献128

引证文献10

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部