期刊文献+

专利作为技术公共事物的治理之道——民主在无效宣告中的引入 被引量:5

Patent as the Means of Governance on the Technological Public Affairs:Leading Democracy into the Patent Invalidation Procedure
原文传递
导出
摘要 专利权被普遍认为是私权,但其实现过程却迥异于理论认识。民主在专利权第二次评估过程中获得机制性设置,专利权的实践由此表现为社会参与的过程;基于各种可能的民主模型,这一过程的秩序获得了正义性价值。专利权无效宣告程序引入民主的理论可能,证立了"专利作为技术公共事物治理之道"的命题,即:向所有人开放、公开;对行政机构决策设定明确的限制条件;结果受控于司法监督。埃莉诺.奥斯特罗姆的公共事务治理之道为此提供了理论深化的智慧和启迪,局外人或权利外人的加入,使专利权无效的民主过程在生活中获致实践。 Patents are generally considered to be private rights ; however, the process of the realization of the rights is different from the theoretical understanding. Democracy achieves institutional settings during the process of the second evolution of patents, in this way, the process of the practice of patents is also the process of community involvement; Based on several possible democratic models, this process can achieve the value of justice. That the theoretical possibility of leading democracy into the patent invalidation procedure proves the statement that a new way of administration over patents as technical public affairs. That is making known to public, setting clear restrictions to the department of administration and all results controlled by the judicial supervision. Elinor Ostrom's a new way of administration over public affairs provides a theoretical basis for the view of this article.
作者 康添雄
出处 《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期41-60,共20页 Law and Social Development
基金 西南政法大学青年项目"专利法的公共政策构造及逻辑展开"(2010XZQN02) 西南政法大学博士项目"专利权无效的社会过程及法律处置"(2010XZYJS158)
关键词 专利 民主 无效宣告 公共事物 patents democracy invalidation public affairs
  • 相关文献

参考文献104

二级参考文献383

共引文献4286

同被引文献67

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部