摘要
专利权被普遍认为是私权,但其实现过程却迥异于理论认识。民主在专利权第二次评估过程中获得机制性设置,专利权的实践由此表现为社会参与的过程;基于各种可能的民主模型,这一过程的秩序获得了正义性价值。专利权无效宣告程序引入民主的理论可能,证立了"专利作为技术公共事物治理之道"的命题,即:向所有人开放、公开;对行政机构决策设定明确的限制条件;结果受控于司法监督。埃莉诺.奥斯特罗姆的公共事务治理之道为此提供了理论深化的智慧和启迪,局外人或权利外人的加入,使专利权无效的民主过程在生活中获致实践。
Patents are generally considered to be private rights ; however, the process of the realization of the rights is different from the theoretical understanding. Democracy achieves institutional settings during the process of the second evolution of patents, in this way, the process of the practice of patents is also the process of community involvement; Based on several possible democratic models, this process can achieve the value of justice. That the theoretical possibility of leading democracy into the patent invalidation procedure proves the statement that a new way of administration over patents as technical public affairs. That is making known to public, setting clear restrictions to the department of administration and all results controlled by the judicial supervision. Elinor Ostrom's a new way of administration over public affairs provides a theoretical basis for the view of this article.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第5期41-60,共20页
Law and Social Development
基金
西南政法大学青年项目"专利法的公共政策构造及逻辑展开"(2010XZQN02)
西南政法大学博士项目"专利权无效的社会过程及法律处置"(2010XZYJS158)
关键词
专利
民主
无效宣告
公共事物
patents
democracy
invalidation
public affairs