摘要
市场极端主义经历了四个阶段的发展。在这些发展阶段中,传统民商法为市场经济的发展与自由市场的形成提供了弥足珍贵的制度支撑,但是无法完全克服市场极端主义带来的种种弊端,这为经济法矫正市场极端主义提供了契机。基于经济法与民商法功能互补的视角而不是二元对立的分析范式,市场极端主义的经济法矫正主要在四个层面发挥作用:一是在制度层面对自由放任的市场经济进行功能性矫正;二是经济法所具有的回应性特质利于其对市场极端主义的克服;三是经济法调整方式的政策性为其克服市场极端主义提供了及时性的便利;四是经济法对平等、真实、公平的分享与发展权利的追求为市场极端主义的经济法矫正机制之建立提供了入口。
Market extremism has experienced four stages in which the traditional civil and commercial law has provided valuable institutional support for the development of market economy and formation of free market,yet it failed to overcome all kinds of defects brought about by market extremism,thus it offers a chance for economic law to redress such extremism.Based on analysis of functional complementation rather than antithesis between economic law and civil and commercial law,the redress role played by economic law covers four levels：firstly,it makes functional redress to the laissez-faire market economy on the institutional level;secondly,its responsive feature is an advantage to overcome market extremism;thirdly,the mode of regulation by policies provides promptness and convenience;fourthly,the pursuit of the right to develop in an equal,real and fair way provides an entrance for the economic law to redress the market mechanism.
出处
《北方法学》
2011年第4期79-88,共10页
Northern Legal Science
关键词
市场极端主义
华盛顿共识
经济人
market extremism
Washington Consensus
homo economics
