期刊文献+

工作同盟问卷的编制 被引量:7

Development of the Working Alliance Questionnaire
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对Bordin的工作同盟理论进行修正,编制工作同盟问卷。方法:在Bordin的理论及前期研究的基础上,假定工作同盟的结构由咨访双方的情感联结、目标任务一致和投入三个维度组成。经过3轮试测,将来自5所大学的心理咨询中心的469位当事人分为2个样本,使用样本1发展测量工具,使用样本2对测量工具进行验证。结果:探索性因素分析显示3个因素能够解释总变异的60%;验证性因素分析及测量等同性检验为问卷结构的稳定性提供了证据;各维度间存在中度相关(r=0.58至0.63),内部一致性均在0.70以上;与已有的工作同盟测量工具WAI-SR有高相关(r=0.86);对咨询效果有显著预测。结论:编制的《工作同盟问卷》(WAQ)的各项测量学指标良好。 Objective: To develop a measure of working alliance in the context of Chinese culture.Methods: Based on Bordin's theory and the results of qualitative research,three components were proposed as the dimensions of the measure to develop,bond,goal-task,and engagement.After 3 pilot studies,469 clients from 5 university counseling centers were divided into 2 samples,with one to develop and the other to confirm the instrument.Results: EFA indicated that 60% of the total variance was explained by the 3 factors.The results of CFA and the test of the measurement invariance confirmed the structure of the measure.Dimensions were correlated with each other moderately and the Cronbach's coefficients for each dimension were above 0.70.The new measure had a strong correlation with WAI-SR(r=0.86) and predicted the outcome significantly.Conclusion: The Working Alliance Questionnaire(WAQ) is a reliable and valid measure.
作者 朱旭 江光荣
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2011年第4期449-453,444,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 心理治疗 工作同盟 测量工具 Psychotherapy Working alliance Measure
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Orlinsky DE, Ronnestad MH, Willutzki U. Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In Lambert MJ. Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley, 2004. 307-389. 被引量:1
  • 2Elvins R, Green J. The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance: An empirical review. Clinical Psy- chology Review, 2008, 28(7): 1167-1187. 被引量:1
  • 3Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic con- cept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Re- search and Practice, 1979, 16(3): 252-260. 被引量:1
  • 4Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2000, 68(3): 438-450. 被引量:1
  • 5朱旭.心理咨询中的工作同盟:概念化与发展模式.武汉:华中师范大学.2010. 被引量:1
  • 6Gaston L. The concept of the alliance and its role in psych- otherapy: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Psych- otherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 1990, 27(2): 143-153. 被引量:1
  • 7Gaston L. Reliability and criterion-related validity of the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales-Patient version. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1991, 3(1): 68-74. 被引量:1
  • 8Horvath AO, Luborsky L. The role of the therapeutic alli- ance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1993, 61(4): 561-573. 被引量:1
  • 9Hatcher RL, Barends AW. Patients' view of the alliance in psychotherapy: Exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1996, 64(6): 1326-1336. 被引量:1
  • 10Horvath AO, Bedi RP. The alliance. In: Norcross JC. Psy- chotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. 37-69. 被引量:1

二级参考文献33

  • 1郑伯埙 周丽芳 樊景立.家长式领导行为[J].本土心理学研究,2000,14:3-64. 被引量:2
  • 2梁觉,周帆.(2008).跨文化研究的方法.见陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立(编).绍织与管理研究的实证方法(pp.385-408).北京:北京大学出版社. 被引量:1
  • 3Brockner, J., Chen, Y. R., Mannix, E. A, Leung, K., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2000). Culture and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 138-159. 被引量:1
  • 4Caporael, L. R. (2001) Evolutionary psychology: Toward a unifying theory and a hybrid science. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 607-628. 被引量:1
  • 5Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Rand McNally: Chicago. 被引量:1
  • 6Chen, Y. R., Brockner, J., & Katz, T. (1998). Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: The role of individual versus collective primacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1490-1502. 被引量:1
  • 7Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117. 被引量:1
  • 8Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J. X., Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z., et al. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs - Is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32,407-433. 被引量:1
  • 9Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An "experimental ethnography". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945-960. 被引量:1
  • 10Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science, 15, 241-253. 被引量:1

共引文献26

同被引文献23

引证文献7

二级引证文献163

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部