期刊文献+

头孢吡肟治疗社区获得性呼吸道感染临床对比观察 被引量:1

Clinical Comparative Research of Community Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections Treated with Cefepime
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价头孢吡肟治疗社区获得性呼吸道感染(CARTIs)的临床疗效。方法:将142例住院确诊为CARTIs患者,随机分为治疗组76例,对照组66例,治疗组用国产头孢吡肟,对照组用进口头孢吡肟,两组药物剂量均为2.0g tid,疗程均为7~14d,按照卫生部颁发的"抗菌药物临床研究指导原则"进行临床观察对比研究。结果:临床疗效两组分别为93.42%和95.45%,细菌学疗效分别为95.71%和95.24%,两组不良反应发生率分别为7.89%和6.06%P>0.05,两组均无明显差异。结论:国产头孢吡肟和进口头胞吡肟对CARTIs治疗同样安全有效。 Objective: To evaluate the treatment effect of Cefepime for community acquired respiratory tract infections(CARTIs). Methods:142 cases who were confirmed diagnosed CARTIs were divided randomly into 76 cases of treatment group and 66 eases of control group.The treatment group were treated with domestic cefepime, The control group were treated with imported cefepime, The dosase of both groups was 2.0g rid. The treatment courses were both 7 to 14 days. The clinical observation and comparative research were done according to the Criteria for Clinical Research of Antibiotics issued by the National Health Ministry. Results:The treatment effect of both groups was 93.42% and 95.45% respectively. The bacteriological cure effect was 95.71% and 95.24% respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions for both groups was 7.89% and 6.06% respectivelyP〉0.05, there were no obvious differences between the both groups). Conclusions:Domestic and imported cefepime were both safe and effective for CARTIs.
作者 吴伟
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2011年第6期1030-1031,共2页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 头孢吡肟 社区获得性呼吸道感染 临床对比观察 国产与进口 Cefepime Tract infections Clinical Comparative Research Domestic and Imported
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献19

共引文献13

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部