摘要
传统的刑事司法实践中,重规范解读轻法官思维一直盛行。在刑事法官的思维方式当中,重形式推理轻实质推理又较为严重。在形式推理中,演绎推理是重心,归纳推理与类比推理常被忽略。形式推理的不足,会导致法官思维僵化,刑法原则遭弃,立法精神迷失;实质推理缺位,则会出现恶法亦法、司法不公及规范滞后等消极现象。构建合适的刑事法律推理机制,并对相关问题予以解读是当务之急。
In the traditional criminal justice practice,it has been prevalent that valuing the specification interpretation while despising the judge thinking.As for the way of thinking of criminal judges,it is more serious that valuing form reasoning while despising real reasoning.About the form reasoning,deductive reasoning is the focus,while inductive reasoning and analogical reasoning are often overlooked.If the form reasoning is not enough,it would lead to negative effects as that judge thinking is rigid,principle of criminal law is abandoned,the legislative spirit is lost;If real reasoning is absent,it would cause draconian also law,miscarriage of justice and lag norm.Therefore,constructing a suitable criminal legal reasoning mechanism and solving related issues is a priority.
出处
《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期608-616,共9页
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金
上海市教委优青项目(SZF10003)
上海市教委刑法学重点学科资助项目(J52103)
