期刊文献+

颈侧清扫术与颈改良根治性清扫术在喉癌cN1治疗中的应用 被引量:1

Lateral Neck Dissection and Modified Neck Dissection in the Treatment of Clinical N1 Laryngeal Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析颈侧清扫术(lateral neck dissection,LND)与改良根治性颈清扫术(modified neck dissection,MND)在治疗喉癌临床N1(clinical N1,cN1)患者中的效果.方法:回顾性分析51例伴cN1期颈淋巴结转移的喉癌患者的临床资料,Kaplan-Meier法统计累积生存率,Log-rank检验比较LND组(37例)和MND组(14例)的生存率.结果:LND组和MND组的5年生存率分别为89.2%和85.7%(P>0.05);5年颈淋巴复发率分别为2.7%和0%(P>0.05);而LND组与颈清扫有关的并发症的发生率为8.1%,明显低于MND组的42.9%(P<0.01);两组的平均住院时间为25 d和32 d(P<0.05).结论:与改良根治性颈清扫术相比,采用颈侧清扫术不影响cN1喉癌患者的疗效,同时降低了并发症的发生率,缩短了住院时间. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of lateral neck dissection (LND) with modified radical dissection (MND) for the treatment of clinical N1 laryngeal carcinoma. Methods :51patients with clinical N1 laryngeal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan - Meier method was used to estimate the survival analysis and Log - rank method for comparison of different distribution of the several influential factors of the survival. Results:The 5 -year survival rates for LND and MND were 89.2% and 85.7% respectively, there was no statistical difference. The neck recurrence for LND was 2.7% , which was not statistically different from the neck recurrence in the MND (0.0%). Complications and times of hospitalization were both decreased in LND group and MND group (8.1% and 42.9, 25d and 32d). Conclusions:Compared with MND, the LND offers the same therapeutic effect and fewer complications and less period of hospitalization for patients with clinical N1 laryngeal carcinoma.
出处 《解剖与临床》 2011年第3期227-230,共4页 Anatomy and Clinics
基金 安徽省卫生厅临床医学重点学科应用技术计划项目(05A007)
关键词 颈淋巴结清扫术 头颈部肿瘤 鳞状细胞 淋巴转移 存活率 Radical neck dissection Head and neck neoplasms Carcinoma, Squamous cell Lymphatic metastasis Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献83

共引文献70

同被引文献14

  • 1边学,徐震纲,吕春梅,唐平章,罗健.头颈肿瘤与外科治疗对患者生存质量的影响[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2005,40(8):606-610. 被引量:24
  • 2栾修文,毛驰,俞光岩,郭传瑸,黄敏娴,马大权.颈清扫术不同术式对cN_0口腔鳞状细胞癌患者肩功能的影响[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2006,41(5):287-290. 被引量:6
  • 3孙正良,冯秀荣,江文,李正贤,刘阳云.108例喉癌手术疗效分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2007,13(4):272-274. 被引量:6
  • 4Crile G.On the Technique of Operations upon theHead and Neck.Ann Surg.1906,44(6):842-850. 被引量:1
  • 5Nahum AM,Mullaly W,Marmor L.A syndromeresulting from radical neck dissection.ArchOtolaryngol.1961,74:424-428. 被引量:1
  • 6Thompson L .World Health Organization classi-fication of tumours:pathology and geneticsof head and neck tumours.Ear Nose ThroatJ,2006,85(2):74. 被引量:1
  • 7Heald SL,Riddle DL,Lamb RL.The shoulderpain and disability index:the construct validityand responsiveness of a region-specific disabilitymeasure.Phys Ther, 1997,77(10):1079-1089. 被引量:1
  • 8Alvarez Buylla BM,Herranz GJ.Qualityof life evolution in patients after surgicaltreatment of laryngeal,hypopharyngeal ororopharyngeal carcinoma.Acta OtorrinolaringolEsp,2011,62(2):103-112. 被引量:1
  • 9Trivic AS,Djukic VB,Krejovic Trivic SB,etal.Postoperative morbidity and quality of live inpatients after radical and modified radical neckdissection.Acta Chir Iugosl,2009,56(3):149-153. 被引量:1
  • 10Krause HR.Reinnervation of the trapeziusmuscleafter radical neck dissection.J CraniomaxillofacSurg, 1994,22(6):323-329. 被引量:1

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部