期刊文献+

腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术术式比较 被引量:4

Comparison between classic intrafascial semm hysterectomy under laparoscope and total abdominal hysterectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除术(CISH)与经腹子宫切除术(TAH)的临床效果。方法对2008年1月~2010年5月该院采用腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除(CISH)病例45例(研究组),并与同期经腹子宫切除(TAH)43例(对照组),比较两种术式的手术并发症、手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间。结果 CISH并发症明显低于TAH,经腹腔镜下子宫切除术较经腹子宫切除术时间短,经腹腔镜子宫切除术术中出血少、术后肛门排气时间早,恢复快。结论腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除术,手术创伤小,恢复快,值得临床应用。 [Objective] To explore the clinical outcomes of classic intrafascial semm hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy(TAH). [Methods] By comparing the complications, time, blood loss, time of gas passage by anus postoperation, length of hospital between 45 patients with CISH(test group) and 43 patients with TAH(controlled group) in our hospital during January2008 and May2010. [Results] Compared with TAH, patients with CISH had obviously lower incidence rate of complication less surgery time, less blood loss, earlier gas passage by anus postoperation, as well as faster recovery. [Conclusions] CISH is of small wound and fast recovery.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期519-521,524,共4页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 腹腔镜下鞘膜内子宫切除术 经腹子宫切除术 classic intrafascial semm hysterectomy (CISH) total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1朱兰,俞梅.子宫肌瘤手术治疗的进展[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(12):712-714. 被引量:84
  • 2关铮主编..微创妇科学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2004:452.
  • 3乐杰,苟文丽主编..妇产科学临床实习指导[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:212.

共引文献83

同被引文献32

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部