摘要
自Barwise & Cooper[1]以来,绝大多数关于限定量化词的研究都认为量化词的限制部分应该是NP,然而,Matthewson[6]在对St’át’imcets语和英语中的量化词研究后却认为,所有的量化词的限制部分都应该是DP。本文通过对汉语中"所有"型量化词的语义进行研究证明,上述两种量化式都是自然语言所需要的。其中,"所有NP"对应的是前者意义上的量化式,"所有的NP"对应的是后者意义上的量化式。同时,本文还将探讨这两种量化式的语义上的异同,并基于此对"所有NP"和"所有的NP"的一系列差异作出解释。
Following Barwise ＆ Cooper [ 1], most researches on Determiner-quantifier hold that its restriction is NP. However, Matthewson [6], based on her research on D-quantifiers in St＇át＇imcets and English, argues that the restriction of all quantificrs is DP. The present study attempts to prove, through investigation of semantics of suoyou quantifier in Mandarin Chinese, that such analyses of D-quantifier are necessary in natural languages. Among them, NP analysis corresponds to suoyou NP and DP analysis corresponds to suoyoude NP. Moreover, this paper also examines the semantic differences between the two types of D-quantifiers and provides some explanations for the differences between stwyou NP and suoyoude NP.
出处
《外国语》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第1期26-33,共8页
Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词
限定量化词
所有
开放集合
封闭集合
域源
determiner-quantifier
suoyou quantifier
open set
closed set
domain resource
