期刊文献+

纸面上的程序法:原因与出路分析——以我国刑事领域的非法证据排除规则为例

the procedural law on Paper: the analysis of reason and Solution——Example of illegal evidence exclusion rules In our criminal field
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国虽然制定了非法证据排除规则,但仍然无法有效阻止刑讯逼供等非法取证现象和冤假错案的产生。究其根本原因,一是与传统观念相冲突,因而无法获得人们在认知上的尊重;二是法治不健全,法律没有足够的权威,非法证据排除规则在实践中自然得不到应有的尊重。在当前,要使非法证据排除规则在防止刑讯逼供等非法取证行为上发挥应有作用,必须对其实施进行有效的监督,包括各级党委的监督、各级人大的监督、媒体的监督以及司法机关相互之间的监督。 Although there is illegal evidence exclusion rules,we still can not effectively Put an end to the phenomenon of illegal evidence such as torture and unjust case.There are two Fundamental causes about it.First,because conflicting with the traditional concepts,It is unable to get people's respect in cognitive.Second,the rule of law is not perfect,that is,the law having no sufficient authority.Naturally,the illegal evidence exclusion rules may not be respected in practice.At present,if we want the Exclusionary Rule works in the prevention of acts of illegal evidence such as torture,we should Strengthen supervision In the implementation of it,Including oversight such as those from Communist Party of China,People's Congress,Media and Mutual supervision.among the Judiciary.
作者 高勇
出处 《宜春学院学报》 2011年第2期1-5,共5页 Journal of Yichun University
关键词 刑讯逼供 非法证据排除规则 执法监督 执政党的监督 Torture Illegal evidence exclusion rules Legal supervision The supervision of the ruling party
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献12

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部