期刊文献+

不同厂家生产的西洛他唑片微生物限度检查方法验证 被引量:2

The Validation Method of Microbial Limit Tests for Different Companies of Cilostazol Tablets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:建立不同厂家的西洛他唑片微生物限度检查方法的验证。方法:菌落计数方法的验证:一厂家采用常规平皿法,另一厂家采用霉菌及酵母菌数测定,为培养基稀释法,每皿0.2 mL,细菌数测定为低速离心加薄膜过滤法,即取1∶10的低速离心供试液10 mL稀释后进行薄膜过滤,用300 mL冲洗液分6次冲洗,泵速为150 r.min-1。结果:不同厂家生产的相同品种、相同规格的西洛他唑片,微生物限度检查方法验证的结果完全不同。结论:处方不同,可以影响药品微生物限度检查的结果。 Objective: To establish a method for determination of microbial limit test in different companies of Cilostazol Tablets. Methods: The validation of the colony-count methods : One is the normal plate count method, the other is that the mold and yeast colony count of other companies was used by the medium dilution method, 0. 2 mL for each plate. The bacteria colony count was used by the low-speed centrifugation and membrane filtration. Got 10 mL of 10% of the sample that had been low-speed centrifuged, then rinsed the membrane six times after the filtration. The total volume of the rinse solution was 300 mL and the speed of the pump was 150 r·min^-1 min . Results: The Cilostazol Tablets of the same kind and specification but different companies had different methods of microbial limit tests. Conclusions: Different prescription could influence the results of medicine microorganism limit tests.
作者 钱文静 张玫
出处 《中国药品标准》 CAS 2011年第1期50-53,共4页 Drug Standards of China
关键词 西洛他唑片 微生物限度 平皿法 薄膜过滤法 Different companies Cilostazaol Tablets Microbial limit tests Validation Plate count method low-speed centrifugation membrane filtration
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献1

  • 1Woo SK, Kang WK, Kwon KI. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of the antiplatelet and cardiovascular effects of cilostazol in healthy humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2002; 71(4):246. 被引量:1

共引文献5

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部