期刊文献+

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗肝硬化并自发性细菌性腹膜炎的成本效果分析 被引量:12

Cost-effectiveness analysis of piperacillin/tazobactam in treating liver cirrhosis combining with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的运用药物经济学原理,比较3种抗菌药物治疗肝硬化并自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的成本-效果分析。方法回顾性调查医院2009年8月-2010年8月应用3种抗菌药物治疗肝硬化并自发性细菌性腹膜炎的62例临床病历(A组为哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组;B组为头孢哌酮/他唑巴坦组;C组为氨曲南组),分析其药物利用及成本消耗情况。结果 3组临床的有效率分别为95.24%、85.71%、85.00%,临床效果分别为:85.24%、76.66%、75.50%;从成本效果分析,3组分别为:15.17%、28.81%、26.47%;从敏感度分析,3组分别为:12.73%、27.58%、25.76%;以上疗效-成本分析表明,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(A组)具有较好的疗效成本比。结论哌拉西林/他唑巴坦对肝硬化并自发性细菌性腹膜炎临床疗效可靠,具有较好的疗效成本比,安全性高;可作为经验性治疗SBP的首选药物。 OBJECTIVE To compare cost-effectiveness to three antibiotics in treating cirrhosis combining with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis by using principles of economics.METHODS A retrospective survey was conducted for the clinical records of 62 cases with liver cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis treated by 3 kinds of antibiotics(A group of piperacillin/tazobactam group;B group cefoperazone/tazobactam group;C group aztreonam group) during Aug 2009-Aug 20010,the cost of their drug use and consumption were analyzed.RESULTS The clinical effective rates of the 3 groups were 95.24%,85.71% and 85.00% respectively,and the clinical effects were:85.24%,76.66% and 75.50%;cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that the three groups were:15.17%,28.81% and 26.47%;the sensitivity analysis showed that the three groups were:12.73%,27.58% and 25.76%;The efficacy-cost analysis showed that piperacillin/tazobactam(A group) had a good effect on the cost ratio.CONCLUSION Piperacillin/tazobactam in treating against cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis has a reliable clinical efficacy and cost effeotive.It can be used as preferred choice of drug for empirical treatment of SBP.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期1211-1213,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 哌拉西林/他唑巴坦 头孢哌酮/他唑巴坦 氨曲南 成本-效果分析 肝硬化 自发性细菌性腹膜炎 Piperacillin/tazobactam Cefoperazone/tazobactam Aztreonam Cost-effectiveness analysis Liver sclerosis Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献7

共引文献434

同被引文献104

引证文献12

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部