摘要
孟子秉持以德服人的仁政立场和王道政治,立场鲜明地反对以力服人的霸政,荀子则认为"王"、"霸"概念在政治理想与目标层面,并不存在根本差异,所不同者只在于前者表征一种纯粹的王道政治,后者体现现实倾向的政治治理。韩非子王霸论的核心,其实在于内政治理以增强自身实力从而在列国兼并过程中求得一席之地,最终目标仍然在于王道。荀韩王霸并用的观念,在秦汉以后的政治实践中不仅长期获得认同,而且在近代亦为中体西用观念提供了理论资源。
Menci takes the position of a benevolent stand and politics of the emperor,which moralize people.He is against the tyrant politics to submit people with force.Xunzi believes there is no difference between idea of ＂emperor＂ and ＂tyrant＂ concerning political ideal and aim.Their difference only lies in the fact that the former embodies a pure emperor politics,while the latter embodies a realistic political rule.The core of Hanfeizi＇s theory of emperor and tyrant aims to keep a place in the course to merger different kingdoms by strengthening self power,ultimately to practice emperor politics.The idea of integrated practice of emperor politics and tyrant politics of Han and Xun is recognized for a long time after Qin Dynasty and Han Dynasty and it also provides theoretical resources for the idea of Chinese culture as basis,western culture as subsidiary in modern time.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期147-152,共6页
Seeking Truth
关键词
孟子
荀子
韩非子
王霸
近代形态
Menci
Xunzi
Hanfeizi
emperor and tyrant
modern form
