摘要
目的:观察灵龟八法治疗肝阳上亢型及痰浊阻络型偏头痛的临床疗效。方法:采用随机对照方法,将纳入标准的偏头痛患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,分别运用灵龟八法及常规辨证取穴法进行针刺治疗,观察其疗效。结果:在短期疗效观察中,灵龟八法组的基本恢复率为43.48%,总有效率为95.65%;对照组的基本恢复率为13.64%,总有效率为90.91%,两组基本恢复率比较P<0.05。在长期疗效观察中,灵龟八法组的基本恢复率为39.13%,总有效率为91.30%;对照组的基本恢复率为9.09%,总有效率为81.82%,两组基本恢复率比较P<0.05。结论:灵龟八法及常规辨证取穴针刺治疗偏头痛均获得良好的疗效,但在基本恢复率的比较中,短期疗效及长期疗效均为灵龟八法组优于常规辨证取穴组。
Objective：To observe Lingguibafa clinical treatment of Migraine.Methods：The standard migraine patients were randomly divided into treatment and control groups by randomized controlled method,then use Lingguibafa and conventional method of selecting points for acupuncture dialectical therapy,and observe the effects.Results：In the short-term observations of curative effect,Lingguibafa group＇s basic recovery rate is 43.38%;markedly effective rate is 34.78%;effective rate is of 17.39%;4.32% is ineffective,and the total effective rate is 95.65%.The basic recovery rate of control group is 13.64%;markedly effective rate is 45.45%;effective rate is 31.82%;8.70% is ineffective,and the total effective rate is 90.91%.The comparison of basic recovery rate of two groups is P〈0.05.In the long-term observation of curative effect,Lingguibafa group＇s basic recovery rate is 39.13%,and the total effective rate is 91.30%.The basic recovery rate of the control group is 9.09%,and the total effective rate is 81.82%.the comparison of basic recovery rate between the two groups is P〈0.05.Conclusion：Lingguibafa and conventional method of selecting points for acupuncture dialectical therapy have good efficacy,but compared with the basic recovery rate of short-term and long-term effects,we can know Lingguibafa group was superior to dialectical point selection group.
出处
《针灸临床杂志》
2011年第2期38-40,共3页
Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
灵龟八法
偏头痛
临床观察
Lingguibafa
Migraine
Clinical observation
