期刊文献+

国际健康素养研究演进路径、研究热点与前沿可视化分析 被引量:5

The Visualization Analysis of Evolution Pathway, Research Hotspots and Research Fronts of International Health Literacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章目的在于梳理30多年来健康素。养领域研究的演进路径,拇示、研究热点与研究前沿。为此,将1990--2010年SCI、SSCI数据库中收录的主题为“健康素养”的论文数据作为研究对象,应用Citespace知识可视化软件绘制文献共被引网络闺谱,析出健康素养演进过程中:的关键节点文献;并应用其文献共引一名词短语混合网络图谱、关键词聚类和膨胀词探测4功能分析了研究热点与研究前沿。11篇关键节点文献很好地展示了健康素养领域研虎的演进路径2个明显的聚类以及19个突观词表征了研究热点与研究前沿。文章认为健康素养和精神健康素养是目前两个主流研凳领域矗健康素养内涵、健康材料的可读性、快速潮评工具和方法、健康教育、突发性事件以及以艾滋病为代表盼慢性痛与传染病是健康素养的研究前沿与发展趋势。 The aim of this paper is to reveal the evolution in the latest 30 years, research hotspots and research fronts of Health Literacy. We retrieved the whole documents data by topic word "health literacy" from 1990 to 2010 in SCI, SSCI. Documents are visualized through a number of co-citation maps, which filtered the critical node documents in the evolution of health literacy research by knowledge visualization tool, CiteSpace. We also applied its function of document-noun phrase network ,keywords clusting and burst detecting to analyse the research hotspots and research fronts. 11 critical node documents perfectly showed the evolution pathway of health literacy research, 2 clear dusters and 19 burst terms indicated the research hotspots and research fronts. Health literacy and mental health literacy are two domain research fields of health literacy. Such subjects or fields as connotation of health literacy, health materials' readability, rapid assessment of literacy levels, health education, emergency and chronic disease or infectious represented by AIDS are research fronts and development trends in futare.
出处 《数字图书馆论坛》 2011年第2期17-24,共8页 Digital Library Forum
基金 本文系教育部人文社抖基金“基于构建主叉理论和E-Leaning构建专业信息素质教育平台”(批准号07JA870011)系列成果之一.
关键词 信息素养 演进路径 研究热点 研究前沿 同被引分析 信息可视化 CITESPACE Health literacy, Evolution pathway, Research hotspots, Research fronts, Co-citation analysis, Information visualization, Citespace
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献138

  • 1宋丽萍,徐引篪.基于可视化的作者同被引技术的发展[J].情报学报,2005,24(2):193-198. 被引量:23
  • 2刘林青.作品共被引分析与科学地图的绘制[J].科学学研究,2005,23(2):155-159. 被引量:57
  • 3Kleinberg J.Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams.Proceedings of Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining(pp.91-101),Edmonton,Alberta,Canada:ACM Press,2002. 被引量:1
  • 4Freeman L C.Centrality in social networks:Conceptual clarification.Social Networks,1979,1:215-239. 被引量:1
  • 5Price D D.Networks of scientific papers.Science,1965,149:510-515. 被引量:1
  • 6van Raan A.On growth,ageing,and fractal differentiation of science.Scientometrics,2000,47(2):347-362. 被引量:1
  • 7Abt H A.Why some papers have long citation lifetimes.Nature,1998,395:756-757. 被引量:1
  • 8Bak P,Chen K.Self-organized criticality.Scientific American,1991,264(1):46-53. 被引量:1
  • 9Chen C,Morris S.Visualizing evolving networks:Minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks.Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization(pp.67-74),Seattle,Washington:IEEE Computer Society Press,2003. 被引量:1
  • 10Small H G,Griffith B C.The structure of scientific literatures i:Identifying and graphing specialties.Science Studies,1974,4:17-40. 被引量:1

共引文献1932

同被引文献67

  • 1李绍山.易读性研究概述[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2000,23(4):1-5. 被引量:101
  • 2郭欣,王克安.健康素养研究进展[J].中国健康教育,2005,21(8):590-593. 被引量:158
  • 3卫生部妇幼保健与社区卫生司,中国健康教育中心/卫生部新闻宣传中心.首次中国居民健康素养调查报告[R].北京:卫生部,2009. 被引量:72
  • 4Simonds SK. Health education as social policy[ J]. Health Education Monographs, 1974,21 : 1 - 10. 被引量:1
  • 5U. S. National Library of Medicine. Current bibliographies in medi- cine[ EB/OL]. ( 2006 - 11 - 01 ) [ 2011 - 05 - 05 ]. http :/Zwww. nlm. nih. gov/archive//20061214/pubs/cbm/hliteracy, html. 被引量:1
  • 6World Health Organization. Health promotion glossary[ M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1998 : 1 - 36. 被引量:1
  • 7Berkman ND, DeWah DA, Pignone MP, et al. Literacy and health out- comes[ R ]. Rockville :Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,2004. 被引量:1
  • 8Law J, Bauin S, Courtial J'P, et al. Policy and the mapping of scien- tific change : a co-word analysis of research into environmental acidi-fieation [ J ]. Scientometries, 1988,14 ( 3 - 4) :251 - 264. 被引量:1
  • 9Davis T, Croueh M, Wills G, et al. The gap between patient reading- eomprehension and the readability of patient education materials [ J ]. Journal of Family Praetiee, 1990,31 ( 5 ) :533 - 538. 被引量:1
  • 10Davis T, Mayeaux E, Fredrickson D, et al. Reading-ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric-patient education materials [ J ]. Pediatrics, 1994,93 (3) :460 - 468. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部