摘要
2010年十一届全国人大常委会第十六次会议上关于取消贪污受贿罪死刑的提议引发了社会大范围的争论,体现了社会各界对我国反腐倡廉建设的关注。文章回顾了犯罪学史上各个学派对死刑存废的争论和限制或废除死刑的相关国际条约,从贪污受贿罪与一般经济犯罪"四要件"的区别、贪污受贿罪侵犯的法益、死刑的功能等法理学角度和现代民主政治宪政的要求、权责相一致的要求等政治学角度论证了贪污受贿罪死刑存在的正当性,基于心理学的期望理论和成本—收益分析论证了贪污受贿罪死刑存在的有效性和必要性,进而反对贪污受贿罪死刑的废除。现阶段我国贪污受贿罪死刑中存在的问题是不严格执行死刑带来的犯罪行为与惩罚之间必定性的缺失,应提高死刑判决标准并严格执行死刑判决。
At the 16th meeting of 2010 11th NPC standing committee,the motion that death penalty for corruption and bribery be abolished triggered a wide range of debate,reflecting social concern from all walks of life about our country＇s anti-corruption construction.This paper reviewed debates on death penalty in the criminology history and relevant international treaties on limiting or abolishing death penalty.The legitimacy of death penalty was elaborated in terms of the differences between corruption and bribery and general economic crime in the ＂four elements＂,the legal interests that corruption and bribery infringes,death penalty functions of jurisprudence,the request of modern democratic and political constitutionalism,and the consistence between power and responsility.Expectancy theory of psychology and cost and income analysis are also employed to expound the nececcity and effectiveness of death penalty for corruption and bribery so to object to the abolition of capital punishment for it.At present,problems with death penalty for corruption and bribery consist in the failure to strictly enforce it and the gap between crime and punishment.It is suggested that the judgment standard for death penalty be raised and death penalty be strictly enforced.
出处
《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》
2010年第12期5-13,18,共10页
Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词
贪污受贿罪
死刑废除
法理学
政治学
心理学
corruption and bribery
abolition of death penalty
jurisprudence
political science
psychology
