摘要
目的：比较紫外线照射与空气循环消毒机两种消毒方法对手术室空气消毒的效果。方法：在保证接台手术合理时间间隔的前提下在相同恒定的温度、湿度条件下，随机将100个手术间（首台手术为骨科内置入无感染手术）分为2组，对照组采用紫外线照射进行空气消毒，实验组采用空气循环消毒机进行空气消毒，接台间隙，污物清理后都经清水擦拭物体表面及地面，分别于第一台手术前、第一台手术毕、第二台手术前、第二台手术毕进行空气采样培养，计算两种方法空气细菌培养的合格率。结果：连台间隙两种消毒方法前后比较P〈0．01，差异有统计学意义。结论：空气循环消毒机优于紫外线照射作用于连台手术间隙的短时间消毒。
Objective.. Compared with ultraviolet radiation and air cycle sterilizing machine two disinfection methods to operating room air disinfection effect. Methods： Meets the Taiwan surgery reasonable time--gap in the guarantee under the premise under the same constant temperature, the humidity condition, （first surgery sets at into 100 surgeries between for orthopedics in non--infection surgery）to divide into stochastically 2 groups,the control group uses the ultraviolet radiation to carry on the air disinfection,the experimental group uses the air cycle sterilizing machine to carry on the air disinfection,meets the Taiwan gap,after the contamina- tion cleaning up all passes through the clear water cleaning object surface and the ground, separately in front of the first surgery, the first surgery finishes,in front of the second surgery, the second surgery finishes carries on the air sampling raise, calculates two method air bacilliculture the qualified rate. Results： Compares P〈0.01 including the Taiwan gap two disinfection methods around, the difference has statistics significance. Conclusion：The air cycle sterilizing machine surpasses the ultraviolet radiation to affect Yu Liantai the surgery gap the short time disinfection.
出处
《按摩与康复医学》
2010年第34期70-71,共2页
Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词
连台手术
空气消毒
医院感染
Including Taiwan surgery Air disinfection Hospital infection
