期刊文献+

国产药物洗脱支架对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死预后的影响 被引量:1

Safety and effectiveness of firebird drug eluting stent in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨国产药物支架(DES)对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)预后的影响。方法对2004-03~2009-04共216例确诊为STEMI的患者分为两组,药物支架(DES)组(n=117)和裸支架(BMS)组(n=99),术后长期随访,观察术后12个月随访终点时支架内再狭窄发生率(ISR)及主要心血管不良事件(包括死亡、急性心肌梗死、靶血管再成形等)发生率。结果 216例患者经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗均成功。介入治疗3~12个月后随访结果显示,DES组再狭窄率明显低于BMS组(P<0.05),两组心血管不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 DES在STEMI患者中有较好的安全性及临床疗效,再狭窄率明显低于BMS(P<0.05)。 Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of firebird drag eluting stentt (DES) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Methods 216 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from March 2004 to April 2009 were divided into two groups: DES group(n = 117) and BMS group(n =99). The occurrence rate of in-stentt restenosis (ISR) and major adverse cardiovascular event (sudden death, reinfarction, revascularization) were analyzed after 12 months of implantation. Results Both groups showed a success rate of 100% in stenting. DES group was much better than BMS group in aspect of ISR(P 〈0. 05). There were no statistic difference in aspect of major adverse cardiovascular event (P 〉 0. 05 ) after 3 to 12 months of implantation. Conclusion DES implanted in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is safety and effectiveness, DES is much better than BMS in aspect of ISR(P 〈0. 05).
出处 《中国临床新医学》 2010年第12期1232-1234,共3页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
关键词 药物支架 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死 再狭窄 心血管事件 Drug-eluting stent Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction In-stentt restenosis Major adverse cardiovascular event
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Silber S,Albertsson P,Ariles FF,et al.Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions.the task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the european society of cardiology[J].Eur Heart J,2005,26(8):804-847. 被引量:1
  • 2Koenig W.Inflammation and coronary heart disease:an overview[J].Cardiol Rev,2001,9(1):31-35. 被引量:1
  • 3Lemos PA,Saia F,Hofma SH,et al.Short and long term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents compared to conventional bare stents for patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,43(4):704-708. 被引量:1
  • 4Morice MC,Serruys PW,Sousa JE,et al.A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization[J].N Engl J Med,2002,346(23):1773-1780. 被引量:1
  • 5Tone GW,Ellis SG,Cox DA,et al.A polymer based paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease[J].N Engl J Med,2004,350(3):221-231. 被引量:1
  • 6Holmes DR,Leon MB,Moses JW,et al.Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial:a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis[J].Circulation,2004,109(5):634-640. 被引量:1
  • 7王临光,冯小平.不同支架对冠心病患者介入术后炎症因子的影响[J].心脏杂志,2008,20(1):55-57. 被引量:4

二级参考文献5

共引文献3

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部