摘要
价值向生产价格的转形问题是马克思经济学的一个基本问题,也是马克思经济理论当中一个具有决定性意义的理论,对它的解释长久以来一直是国际学术界争论的焦点。冯金华教授从2008年开始对价值转形问题展开了一系列深刻而富有创意的研究,其研究建立在"偏离系数法"这一基本方法上,根据"两部类补偿"这一约束条件,通过一系列的证明得出:"生产价格总是等于价值的",从而宣称马克思经济学中的"价值转形"是一个多余的命题。本文通过分析冯金华教授的论证过程,强调了价值和生产价格范畴各自不同的经济规定性,证明了尽管冯金华教授的研究富有意义和创意,但由于其在研究过程中忽视了价值范畴和生产价格的规定性上的本质区别,造成其方法和结论都是错误的。
Professor Feng Jinhua has done a series of interesting and creative researches on the classical value transformation theory from 2008 and achieved some controversial conclusions.His researches were based on the requirement of compensations from the value of different sectors in the framework of ＂deviation coefficients＂.Then he proved that the product price is always equal to the value.And he declared that the value transformation is redundant.But this paper argues that because of the misunderstanding of the different regulations of value and product price,the method and conclusion of the researches of Prof.Feng are wrong,although they are in some cases meaningful and creative.
出处
《经济评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第1期31-38,50,共9页
Economic Review
关键词
价值转形
生产价格
劳动价值论
Value Transformation
Production Price
Labor Value Theory
