期刊文献+

市场、制度与网络:产业发展的三种解释范式 被引量:13

Market,Institution and Network:Three Explanatory Paradigms of Industrial Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 产业发展长期以来一直是社会科学研究的重要内容,从现有的理论来看,主要形成了三个理论解释范式,即以新古典经济产业理论为代表的市场主义的解释范式、以历史制度学派和组织制度学派为代表的制度主义的解释范式,以及以网络和社会资本等新兴产业理论为代表的网络主义的解释范式。这三种理论范式分别把市场机制、制度与产业政策、产业网络与社会资本等因素视为产业发展的核心机制。在一定意义上,这些解释范式分别存在着"市场决定论"、"制度决定论"与"网络决定论"的倾向。 Industrial development has been an important issue in social science research. Three explanatory paradigms on this topic have emerged from the existing theories. They are the marketism paradigm represented by the neo-classic industry theories; the institutionalism paradigm represented by the historical institutionalism school and the organizational institutionalism school in economic sociology; and the networkism paradigm represented by the theories of networks and social capital. These theoretical paradigms take market mechanism, institution,policies in the industry,industrial networks,and social capital as the core explanatory factors for industrial development. Accordingly,in some sense, these paradigms have a transparent inclination of "market-determinism ", "institution-determinism",and"network-determinism",respectively.
作者 梁波 王海英
出处 《社会》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期90-117,共28页 Chinese Journal of Sociology
基金 上海大学博士创新基金"制度与行动策略:中国石油产业发展范式变迁的组织社会学分析"课题(SHUCX091066)成果之一~~
关键词 市场主义 制度主义 网络主义 解释范式 marketism institutionalism networkism explanatory paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献79

  • 1Batjargal, Bat and Mannie M. Liu. 2002. "Entrepreneurs' Access to Private Equity in China: The Role of Social Capital. " Williom Davidson Working Paper (April), No. 453. 被引量:1
  • 2Batjargal, Bat. 2003. " Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Performance in Russia: A Longitudinal Study", Organization Studies 24(4):535- 556. 被引量:1
  • 3Baumol, William J. 1982. "Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure. " A mericco't Economic Review 72(1) : 1 - 15. 被引量:1
  • 4Boltho, Andrea. 1985. "Was Japan's Industrial Policy Successful.'?" Cambridge Journal of Economics (9) : 187 - 201. 被引量:1
  • 5Borgatti, Stephen P. and Pacey C. Foster. 2003. "The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research : A Review and Typology. " Journal of Management 29(6) : 991 - 1013. 被引量:1
  • 6Burr, Ronald S. 1992. Structure Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 被引量:1
  • 7Campbell, John L. 1998. "Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy. " Theory and Society 27(3) :377 - 409. 被引量:1
  • 8柴盈,何自力.论完全理性与有限理性——对现代经济学理性假设的反思[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,45(5):57-63. 被引量:33
  • 9程玉春,夏志强.西方产业组织理论的演进及启示[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(1):132-137. 被引量:7
  • 10道宾,弗兰克.2008a.打造产业政策:铁路时代的美国、英国和法国[M].上海:上海人民出版社. 被引量:1

二级参考文献408

同被引文献254

引证文献13

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部