摘要
法官量刑裁量的合理性取决于法官接触量刑证据信息的时间、承担量刑证明责任的主体在证明中的力量对比和具体的量刑证据制度。定罪证据与量刑证据有不同的制度逻辑,我国法官使用相同的证据规则处理定罪证据和量刑证据不利于量刑证据信息的获取和法官量刑裁量的作出,平衡量刑程序中控辩双方的力量、重置量刑证据制度、充分保障法官接触量刑证据的时间和量刑证据信息占有量是解决量刑问题行之有效的方法。
The reasonableness of sentencing judges depends on the time,the principal balance of power,and the sentencing evidence system.Incriminating evidence and sentencing evidence has different institutional logic.Applying the same standard to the incriminating evidence and sentencing evidence is not conducive to both the the access to sentencing evidence and the making of sentencing discretion,to which most of issues in the sentencing process in China are related.It＇s a relatively reasonable path to rebuilt the system of sentencing evidence.
出处
《湖南工程学院学报（社会科学版）》
2010年第4期78-81,共4页
Journal of Hunan Institute of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
关键词
量刑证据
量刑裁量
影响因素
合理实施
sentencing evidence
sentencing discretion
influencing factors
reasonable implementation
