摘要
台湾地区在家庭暴力事件的处理上,经历了当事人自治为主到公权力积极干预的发展过程。然而作为重要的公权力干预手段的保护令制度,并未取得预期的良好效果,保护令的核发速度和核发内容均不能满足社会需求。鉴于家庭暴力之特质与调解模式的高度契合,调解在家庭暴力领域弥补公权力不足的功能重新获得重视。而乡镇市调解作为台湾地区最基层也最受群众欢迎的调解制度,在处理家庭暴力事件上具有极大的制度优势。总之,在家庭暴力事件的处理上,公权力干预与调解模式是相互配合的关系,二者并行不悖。
There is a developing process from self-rule to public-rule on family violence in Taiwan province. However, the protection order that is the important public-ruling means had not attached the anticipative good effect. Both the speed and con- tent of protection order approved did not satisfy ＇the social need. There is great correspondence between family violence and me- diation, so mediation can be used to remedy the limitation of public-rule. Whereas the district committee of mediation is rock- bottom and welcome in Taiwan province, it is very appropriate to disposing family violence. In conclusion, public-rule and mediation is paratactic and coexisting in disposing family violence.
出处
《台湾研究集刊》
CSSCI
2010年第5期34-45,共12页
Taiwan Research Journal
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(08JC820039)
关键词
台湾地区
家庭暴力
公力救济
调解
乡镇市调解
Taiwan province, family violence, public remedy, mediation, district committee of mediation
