期刊文献+

鳞状细胞相关抗原和血管内液生长因子在宫颈浸润癌新辅助化疗前后的改变及临床意义 被引量:1

Changes and clinical significance of tumor markers Scc-Ag and VEGF expression in invasive cervical carcinoma pre and post neoadjuvant chemotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究鳞状细胞相关抗原(Scc-Ag)和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)在宫颈浸润癌新辅助化疗前、后水平的改变,探讨其在宫颈浸润癌诊断和新辅助化疗疗效观察中的临床意义。方法:分别采用化学发光检测技术和酶联免疫(ELISA)法测定89例宫颈浸润癌患者新辅助化疗前后Scc-Ag和VEGF水平,并进行对比分析和观察。结果:①89例宫颈浸润癌患者新辅助化疗前Scc-Ag和VEGF的中位值水平分别为13.61μg/L和393.75μg/L,阳性率为60.67%(54/89)和73.03%(65/89);新辅助化疗后Scc-Ag和VEGF的中位值水平分别为7.59μg/L和286.37μg/L,阳性率为51.68%(46/89)和65.16%(58/89)。新辅助化疗前、后比较中位值水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),阳性率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②宫颈浸润癌患者新辅助化疗后的总反应率为83.15%(74/89),可手术率为77.52%(69/89),化疗无反应率为22.47%(20/89),4例患者新辅助化疗后Scc-Ag和VEGF水平恢复正常;但有10例患者Scc-Ag和VEGF水平较新辅助化疗前增高更为显著(P<0.05),且皆为对化疗无反应的手术困难病例。结论:Scc-Ag和VEGF是诊断宫颈浸润癌较为灵敏的指标,接受新辅助化疗后,部分患者Scc-Ag和VEGF恢复到正常水平,少数患者Scc-Ag和VEGF水平增高更明显,且皆为对化疗无反应的手术困难病例,预后差。因此,Scc-Ag和VEGF是宫颈浸润癌较敏感的实验观察指标,在宫颈浸润癌诊断和新辅助化疗疗效观察中有一定的临床应用价值。 Objective:To study the changes of squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen (Scc-Ag) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in invasive cervical carcinoma pre and post neoadjuvant chemotherapy,and explore its clinical significance in the diagnosis and efficacy observation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive cervical carcinoma. Method:The Scc-Ag and VEGF levels of 89 patients with invasive cervical carcinoma pre and post neoadjuvant chemotherapy were detected by chemiluminescence immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA),respectively,and compared. Result:①The median levels of Scc-Ag and VEGF of 89 invasive cervical carcinoma patients pre neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 13.61 μg/L and 393.75 μg/L,respectively; and the positive rates were 60.67% (54/89) and 73.03% (65/89),respectively. The median levels of Scc-Ag and VEGF post neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 7.59 μg/L and 286.37 μg/L,respectively; and the positive rates were 51.68% (46/89) and 65.16% (58/89),respectively. There were significant differences of the median levels of Scc-Ag and VEGF between pre and post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P0.05),while there were no significant differences of positive rates(P 0. 05). ②After neoadjuvant chemotherapy,the total response rate of patients with invasive cervical carcinoma was 83.15% (74/89),operation rate was 77.52% (69/89),and non-response rate for chemotherapy was 22.47% (20/89). The Scc-Ag and VEGF levels of 4 patients returned to normal after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However,the Scc-Ag and VEGF levels of 10 patients increased more significantly(P0.05),who all had no response to chemotherapy and difficult to surgery. Conclusion:Scc-Ag and VEGF would be more sensitive indicators in the diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy,the Scc-Ag and VEGF levels of some patients returned to normal,and a small number increased more obviously who all had no response to chemotherapy and difficult to surgery
出处 《临床血液学杂志(输血与检验)》 CAS 2010年第4期470-472,共3页 Journal of Clinical Hematology(Blood Transfusion & Laboratory Medicine)
关键词 肿瘤标记物 宫颈肿瘤 新辅助化疗 tumor markers invasive cervical carcinoma neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献57

  • 1黄欣,李孟达.子宫颈腺鳞癌29例临床分析[J].新医学,1997,28(S1):58-59. 被引量:2
  • 2荆结线,邵淑丽,田保国,韩存芝,赵先文,杜丽丽,张中书.宫颈癌SCCAg检测及其临床意义[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(21):1242-1244. 被引量:13
  • 3程晓东,吕卫国,叶枫,陈怀增,谢幸.局部晚期子宫颈癌新辅助化疗价值的评估[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(2):95-98. 被引量:66
  • 4连利娟.林巧稚妇科肿瘤学.4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:343. 被引量:1
  • 5Shingleton HM, Bell MC, Fremgen A, et al. Is there really a difference in survival of women with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer, 1995,76 : 1948-1955. 被引量:1
  • 6Yasuda S, Kojima A, Maeno Y, et al. Poor prognosis of patients with stage Ib1 adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with pelvic lymphnode metastasis. Kobe J Med Sci, 2006, 52:9- 15. 被引量:1
  • 7Lai CH, Hsueh S, Hong JH, et al. Are adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas different from squamous carcinomas in stage IB and II cervical cancer patients undergoing primary radical surgery? Int J Gynecol Cancer, 1999, 9:28-36. 被引量:1
  • 8Greer BE, Koh WJ, Nadeem AR, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology cervical cancer [ EB/OL]. 2006 [2007- 05-15 ] . http://www. nccn. org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines, asp. 被引量:1
  • 9Yamamoto R, Okamoto K, Yukiharu T, et al. A study of risk factors for ovarian metastases in stage Ⅰb-Ⅲb cervical carcinoma and analysis of ovarian function after a transposition. Gynecol Oncol, 2001, 82:312-316. 被引量:1
  • 10Natsume N, Aoki Y, Kase H, et al. Ovarian metastasis in stage ⅠB and Ⅱ cervical adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol, 1999, 74: 255-258. 被引量:1

共引文献72

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部