摘要
詹子庆教授主编《中国古代史》(第二版)第一章《中国的原始社会》不到2万字,但存在和反映的问题很明显:1.教材结构、体例及相关内容的组织有欠科学、合理;2.机械套用"母系父系"社会进程理论,有移花接木、隔靴搔痒之嫌;3.考古学知识、常识欠缺,对考古发掘材料了解、利用较少;4.论述问题牵强附会明显,大多没有说服力或说服力不够;5.观点与材料常成割裂状态,拼凑痕迹明显;6.常把考古材料作"浆糊"使用,甚至当作"面团"任意揉搓;7.表达观点和材料运用都极不严谨,自相矛盾较多;8.文章没有章法,行文时有莫名其妙之处,也有语法、标点、逻辑等低级错误。该教材主要用于"培训中学历史教师",使用已长达二十余年,影响深广。由于其编写极不严谨、科学(仅指第一章),所以它难以担当或自期作为培训合格的中学历史教师之教材。该教材存在的问题延宕至今,一定程度上反映了我国学术现状堪忧、大学历史教材堪忧、大学教育堪忧。
Zan Ziqing edits Ancient History of China （second edition）. In the first chapter, China＇s primitive society as a whole amounts to 20 thousands words, but it reflects many problems. First, the structure, style and some related contents is not scientific and reasonable. Second, using the social processing theory too mechanical and lacking the normal knowledge and materials. Third, it lacks the persuasion power. Fourth, the views and materials do not have relation. Fifth, the use of the material is weak. Seventh, the views and materials conflict each other. Eighth, it has many grammar mistakes. This text book is mainly used in training middle school teacher for 20 years and has great influence. However, due to the weak compiling, it can not be the text book for the middle school teacher.
出处
《重庆文理学院学报（社会科学版）》
2010年第5期21-33,共13页
Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences（Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
詹子庆
中国古代史
原始社会
历史教材
批评
学术
大学教育
Zan Ziqing
ancient history of China
primitive society
history text book
criticize
university education
