期刊文献+

英美法警察自由裁量权的发展

On the Development of Police's Diseretionary Power in Common Law System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 警察自由裁量权是现代社会中行政裁量权实施的重要方式,也是警察职能行使之必需。英美法警察自由裁量权经历了从禁忌话语到被承认的过程。在被确认为一种实质性权力之后,围绕其行使标准的合理性,学界和实务界就典型个案进行了一系列探讨,这些探讨将判断裁量合理性的"好意原则"进一步细化。目前,英美法警察裁量权主要适用于家庭暴力、交通违章、仇视性犯罪、强制力运用和反道德犯罪等领域。如何在既定领域中正确行使自由裁量权,是未来亟需解决的问题。 Police's diseretionary power is an important way to implement the administrative discretion in mordern society,as well as a necessity to play the police's function.In common law system,it had been regarded as a taboo and later was accepted.After that,a probe had been taken into its reasonable standard and a further refinement was brought out to judge the good-will principle.Currently,it is mainly applied in family violence,traffic violations,hatred-related crime,use of the compelling force and anti-morality crime.As to how to implement the diseretionary power in some certain field,it is still a problem.
作者 冯磊
出处 《安徽警官职业学院学报》 2010年第4期4-8,共5页 Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
基金 重庆市公安局软科学课题<警察职权行使中的合理性妥协研究>(项目编号200802)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 英美法 警察自由裁量权 好意原则 合理性标准 适用范围 common law system police's diseretionary power good-will principle reasonable standard scope of application
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[美]肯尼斯·卡尔普,戴维斯.裁量正义--一个初步考察[M].毕洪海,译.北京:商务印书馆,2009:26,93-94. 被引量:1
  • 2Kathlyn Schellenberg Policing the Police:Surveillance and Predilection for Leniency [J].Criminal Justice and behavior.2000 (vol27) : 667. 被引量:1
  • 3L. Radzinowicz.A history of English criminal law and its ad- ministration from 1750[M].Sweet and Maxwell, 1956:162-163. 被引量:1
  • 4Gregory Howard Williams.Police discretion: a comparative perspective[J].Indiana Law Journal.1989 (Fall) : 900-902,889-894. 被引量:1
  • 5Brixton Disorders: The Scarman Report[EB/OL].http://hansard. millbanksystems.com/lords/1982/feb/04/brixton -disorders -/be - scarman-report, ( 2010-04-06). 被引量:1
  • 6Abigail Caplovitz.Drafting limits: statute text and the police discretion to define disorder[J]. Journal of Law and Social Challenges,2003, (5) :93. 被引量:1
  • 7Ryan C. Hasanbasic.Town of castle rock v. gonzales: the supreme court goes to great lengths to ensure police discretion, but at what cost? [J].Stetson Law Review,2007(spring):882-884. 被引量:1
  • 8George L. Kelling."Broken Windows" and Police Discretion [EB/OL].http://www.ncjrs.gov/pd ffiles 1/nij/178259.pdf .37. 被引量:1
  • 9Arnold, Thurman. the Symbols of Government [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1935:160. 被引量:1
  • 10Sanford H. Kadish. Legal Norm and Discretion in the Police and Sentencing Processes [J]. Harvard Law Review March, 1962 : 907-913. 被引量:1

二级参考文献9

  • 1Oran Daniel.Law Dictionary for Nonlawyers[]..1985 被引量:1
  • 2M.L.Dantzker.Understanding Today’s Police[]..2003 被引量:1
  • 3Samuel walker.Taming the System:The control of Discre-tion in Criminal Justice 1950-1990[]..1993 被引量:1
  • 4Samuel walker.Taming the System:The control of Discre-tion in Criminal Justice 1950-1990[]..1993 被引量:1
  • 5Ellen Cohn,Lawrence W Sherman.Citizens Killed byBig City Police[]..1987 被引量:1
  • 6. 被引量:1
  • 7Robert Reiner.《Policing Volume ii》[]..1996 被引量:1
  • 8Goldstein,H.Policing a free society[]..1977 被引量:1
  • 9Joseph Goldstein.Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process:Low Visibility Decisions in the Administration of Justice[].《Yale Law Journal 》.1960 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部