摘要
关于经济法的"龙头法",不仅是一个理论问题,也不是无关紧要的借喻,它关系到政府在经济中扮演何种角色、发挥什么样的作用,因而具有重要的实践价值,值得反思和探讨。从此次国际金融危机反映的情况看,所谓反垄断法是经济法"龙头法"和"经济宪法"的命题其实不能成立。反垄断法的作用是维护、弘扬市场机制,而市场"劣汰"、力所不能、周期和失控等弊端,需由财政法统领以实现经济的整体布局和统筹协调发展。相对于规划和产业政策法,财政法对经济的调控和主导具有直接、全面及整体性,也最具刚性和力度,而且它是经济法与宪政的衔接,本身即具有宪政暨"经济宪法"的性质。因此,无论中外,财政法都是经济法的"龙头法"。
With regard to Economic Law,the leading law is not only a theoretical issue,nor is it irrelevant metaphor.It is related to the role that governments play in economic activities.Hence,it has crucial practical value and worthy rethinking and discussion.The proposition of Anti-monopoly Law is the leading law in Economic Law and Economic Constitution is unjustified from the reflexion of recent global financial crisis.The role of Anti-monopoly Law is to safeguard and promote market mechanisms.There are many market imperfections,such as,bad elimination,market failure,economic cycle and out of control.Only Fiscal Law leads the role of achieving overall economic development of the layout and co-ordination in market imperfections.Compare to planning and industrial policy laws,fiscal law＇s regulation and leading to the economy not only has some of the characters,direct,comprehensive and holistic,but also is a convergence of economic law and constitutional.The combination of Economy and constitution makes Fiscal Law has the nature of Economic Constitution.Therefore,Fiscal Law should be regarded as leading law in Economic Law both in China and other countries.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期172-177,共6页
China Legal Science
