期刊文献+

CAFTA争端解决机制条约化之路——NAFTA、CAFTA争端解决机制的比较视角 被引量:10

The Path of Legalization of Dispute Settlement Mechanism of the CAFTA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着中国—东盟《全面经济合作框架协议争端解决机制协议》的签署,CAFTA争端解决机制的条约化之路迈出了可喜的一步。CAFTA争端解决机制现有构架不能简单复制NAFTA,其完善也必须考虑各成员方的贸易依附程度、经济实力、自有的区域争端解决机制及各成员方的政治、文化与历史诸因素。CAFTA争端解决机制应从引进NAFTA投资争端解决机制、促使磋商、调解或调停程序机制化、具体化、完善现有仲裁程序三方面进行改进。 Legalization of dispute settlement mechanism of the CAFTA has made much progress since China-ASEAN Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation in the Dispute Settlement Mechanism of the Agreement was signed in 2002.Copying the dispute settlement mechanism of NAFTA can't solve the practical problems of CAFTA.The factors such as the degree of dependence of the members,economic strength,different dispute settlement mechanism and politics,culture and history of the members should be considered in order to perfect the dispute settlement mechanism of CAFTA,and futher the present dispute settlement mechanism of the CAFTA should be improved by introducing the dispute settlement mechanism of investment of the NAFTA,promoting mechanism of the procedure of negotiation,conciliation and mediation and bettering the existing arbitration procedure.
作者 孙志煜
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期422-427,共6页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
关键词 CAFTA NAFTA 争端解决机制 条约化 CAFTA NAFTA dispute settlement mechanism legalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献15

  • 1UNCITRAL, Pope and Talbot Interim Award, June 26, 2000http ://www. dfait - maeci. gc. ca/tna - nac/documents/pubdoc7. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 2UNCITRAL, Pope and Talbot Award on Preliminary Motion by the Government of Canada, January 26,2000 http ://www. dfait - maeci.gc. ca/tna - nac/pubdoc7. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 3UNCITRAL, S. D. Myers final Award, December 30, 2002http ://www. dfait - maeci. gc. ca/tna - nac/documents/MyersFinal Award - Final - 30 - 12 - 02. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 4Secretariat of NAFTA( 1992 ) , North America Free Trade Agreement, December, 1992 http ://www. nafta - sec - alena. org/english/index. htm. 被引量:1
  • 5Jones, Ray (2002) NAFTA Chapter 11 Investor - to - State Dispute Resolution: A Shield to Be Embraced or a Sword to Be Feared?Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 2002 Issue 2. 被引量:1
  • 6Strazzeri, Joseph A. (2002), A Lucas Analysis of Regulatory Expropriations Under NAFTA Chapter Eleven, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Summer2002, Vol. 14 Issue 4. 被引量:1
  • 7Mcllroy, James (2001), Private Investment Claims Against States And Provinces - The Impact Of NAFTA Chapter 11, Canada - United States Law Journal; 2001, Vol. 27. 被引量:1
  • 8Mann, Howard, Moltke, Konrad yon ( 1999 ), NAFTA's Chapter 11 and the Environment: Addressing the Impacts of the Investor - State Process on the Environment, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development. 被引量:1
  • 9Weiler, Todd ( 2002 ), NAFTA Investment Arbitration and the Growth of International Economic Law, [ 2002 ] B. L. I. Issue 2:0 International Bar Assoeiation. 被引量:1
  • 10ICSID, Marvin Feldman Karpa Final Award, December 16,2002 http://www. dfait - maeci. gc. ca/tna - nac/documents/FeldmanAward. pdf. 被引量:1

共引文献4

同被引文献116

引证文献10

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部