期刊文献+

喹硫平治疗慢性男性精神分裂症的对照研究

喹硫平治疗慢性男性精神分裂症的对照研究
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较(国产)喹硫平和利培酮治疗慢性男性精神分裂症的临床疗效与不良反应。方法将符合入组标准的60例慢性男性精神分裂症住院患者随机分为喹硫平组30例和利培酮组30例,分别给予喹硫平和利培酮治疗6周,采用简明精神病评定量表(BPRS),副反应量表(TESS)分别评定疗效和不良反应。用简易智能状态检查量表(MMSE)测评对认知功能的影响。结果治疗结束时,两组BPRS评分较入组时均明显下降(P<0.01);两组MMSE评分明显增加(P<0.05)。两组之间无显著性差异(P>0.05),但喹硫平组较利培酮组不良反应少而轻。结论 (国产)喹硫平治疗慢性男性精神分裂症安全性高,依从性好,是一种有效且安全的新型抗精神病药物。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety between(Domestic)quetiapine and risperidone in the treatment of chronic male schizophrenia.Methods 60 patients with chronic male schizophrenia were randomly divided into quetiapine group and risperidone group,and treated with quetiapine and risperidone respectively for 6 weeks.Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale(BPRS)was used to assess the clinical efficacy,and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS)was used to assess adverse reactions.cognitive function was assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).Results At the end of treatment,two group BPRS scores,were significantly reduced(P〈0.01);two group MMSE scores,were significantly increased(P〈0.05).There is no significant difference in the two groups(P〉0.05).but contrast risperidone,quetiapine has less and slight side reactions.Conclusion(Domestic)quetiapine is an effective and safe drug,as new atypical antipsychotic to treat Chronic male schizophrenia.This therapy is efficient and high safe.
机构地区 宝鸡市康复医院
出处 《当代医学》 2010年第15期130-131,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 (国产)喹硫平 利培酮 慢性男性精神分裂症 (Domestic)Quetiapine Risperidone Schizophrenia
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1McConville B J, Arvanitis LA,Thyrum PT,et al. Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and clinical effectiveness of quetiapine fumarate: an open-label trial in adolescents with psychotic disorders[J].J Clin Psychiatry, 2000,61: 252-260. 被引量:1
  • 2Findling RL. Use of quetiapine in children and adolescent[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2002,63 (Suppl): 27-31. 被引量:1
  • 3Stefan L, Kristian W, et al. New generation antipsychotics versus low-potency conventional antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet, 2003; 361 : 1581-1589. 被引量:1
  • 4Soares BC, O, Fenton M, Chue P. Sulpiride for schizophrenia. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2005; (4). 被引量:1
  • 5Awad G, et al. New antipsychotics, compliance, quality of life, and subjective tolerability-are patients better off?. Can J Psychiatry, 2004; 49: 297-302. 被引量:1
  • 6Iasser R, Bossie C, et al. Efficacy and safety of long-acting risperidone in elderly patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2004; 19: 898-905. 被引量:1
  • 7Ko SY, Chen PS, Yang YK, et al. Correlation between scores on Continuous Performance Test and plasma concentration for schizophrenic patients on risperidone. Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2004; 58: 168-172. 被引量:1
  • 8Lindenmayer JP, Volavka J, Lieberman J, et al. Olanzapine for schizophrenia refractory to typical and atypical antipsychotics: an open-label, prospective trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001; 21: 448. 被引量:1
  • 9Revicki DA. Cost effectiveness of the newer atypical antipsychotics: a review of the pharmacoeconomic research evidence. Curr Opin Invesaig Drugs, 2001 ; 2 (1) : 110-117. 被引量:1
  • 10Tandon R. Quetiapine has a direct effect on the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp. 2004;19: 559-563. 被引量:1

共引文献321

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部