摘要
针对拙作《"之所以"的词汇化》,王兴才先生(2007、2009)先后发表了两篇质疑文章。这两篇文章基本观点完全相同。王兴才(2007)提出了以下几点商榷意见:1."所以VP"是体词性结构,不具有谓词性;2."之"并非取消句子独立性的助词;3."之所以"的来源有两个,一个是"之所以_1"("之"为结构助词),另一个是"之所以_2"("之"为指示代词);4."其所以"跟"之所以"同类,"之所以""用于起句"是受"其所以"的影响所致。本着深化认识、繁荣学术、发展科学的思想,本文就此逐一作进一步的分析讨论。
We once pointed out in the published paper'On the Lexicalization of Zhisuoyi(之所以)'that'zhisuoyi(之所以)'being used as a conjunction in Contemporary Chinese originates from a cross-structural non-phrase construction in Ancient Chinese.After this paper was published,a certain scholars proposed some different opinions on the related issues due to some misunderstandings.So in this paper we reanalyze the related issues in more detail.
出处
《汉语学报》
CSSCI
2010年第2期21-28,共8页
Chinese Linguistics
关键词
“之所以”词汇化
再分析
zhisuoyi(之所以)
lexicalization
reanalysis
