期刊文献+

试论当代中国的“部门法哲学”概念 被引量:1

On the Concept of "Applied Legal Philosophy" in Contemporary China
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过语义辨析来尝试澄清"部门法哲学"概念的混乱状况,可以建议使用"法律科学"与"法律哲学"这对界定比较清晰的范畴来讨论问题。"法律科学"是指"探究法律现象的普遍规律和普遍解释的思想活动",作为"法律科学"的下位概念,可以区分"一般法律科学"和"特殊(领域的)法律科学";"法律哲学"是指"以法律思想本身为对象的反思和批判活动",它们都探究"法律是什么"这个根本性问题。"部门法哲学"就是指"以特殊领域的法律思想为对象的反思和批判活动"。造成"部门法哲学"概念混乱基于两个虚假前提,即"混淆知识成果和思想活动"以及"学科分立天然正当"。 It can be suggested that making use of legal science and legal philosophy both of which are clearly-defined categories discusses problems in order to try to clarify the mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy through semantic analysis. Legal science indicates the thinking activities which research into the universal rules and interpretations of legal phenomena. General legal science and particular legal science can be differentiated as the inferior concepts of legal science. Legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought itself. Both legal science and legal philosophy explore the fundamental problem of what is law. Applied legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought in particular field. The mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy is based on two false premises,that is,confusing knowledge fruits and thinking activities on the one hand,the natural rationality of subject division on the other hand.
作者 蔡宏伟
出处 《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期36-43,共8页 Law and Social Development
关键词 法律科学 法律哲学 部门法哲学 legal science legal philosophy applied legal philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献38

共引文献63

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部