期刊文献+

作为一种新的质性研究方法的层创方法 被引量:1

Emergent Methods as A New Form of Qualitative Research Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 层创方法是一种新的质性研究方法,目的在于用非常规的方法来解决跨学科研究中出现的复杂性问题。层创方法是指事先没有确切的想法,通过人际互动、沟通、冲突和协调而形成的一种方法。它是对社会经济变化、技术创新和研究范式转换所做的一种回应,本质上是一种方法论,有助于增进对整个研究过程的权力和权威问题的认识。层创方法不是一个实体而是一个过程,不同的质性方法有不同的层创程度,层创设计对质性研究方法有着特别重要的意义。 As a new kind of qualitative research methods,emergent methods aim at addressing the complex questions raised in the interdisciplinary studies by using unconventional technique.Emergent methods refer to those that are formed through the interpersonal interactions,communications,conflicts and coordination without any certain ideas previously.As a response to the socio-economic change,technological innovation and research paradigm shift,emergent methods are methodology in essence,and helpful in advancing our understanding of issues of power and authority throughout the research process.Emergent methods are part of a process instead of an entity.And different qualitative methods have different degree of emergence.Emergent design is of particularly crucial implications for qualitative research methods.
作者 蒋逸民
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期13-19,共7页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词 层创方法 层创设计 质性研究方法 范式转换 方法论 Emergent Methods,Emergent Design,Qualitative Research Methods,Paradigm Shift,Methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1[英]约翰·汤姆林森.《全球与文化》[M],郭英剑译,南京大学出版社2002年版. 被引量:1
  • 2Calvin,T.(2000).Straight with a twist:queer theory and the subject of homosexuality.Urbana:University of Illinois Press. 被引量:1
  • 3Denzin,N.K.,(1989).The research act:a theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd Ed.).Englewood Cliffs,NJ; Prentice Hall. 被引量:1
  • 4George H.Lewes,Problems of Life and Mind,First Series:The Foundations of a Creed,vol.II (1875).University of Michigan Library:ISBN 1425555780. 被引量:1
  • 5Givens,L.M.(2008).The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods,Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publications,Inc. 被引量:1
  • 6Goldstein,J.(1999).Emergence as a construct:History and issues.Emergence:A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management,1 (1),49-72. 被引量:1
  • 7Hesse-Biber.S.N.,& Leavy,P.(2006).Emergent methods in social research.Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. 被引量:1
  • 8Hesse-Biber.S.N.,& Leavy,P.(2008).Handbook of Emergent methods.The Guilford Press,New York. 被引量:1
  • 9Hesse-Biber.S.N.(2007).Handbook of feminist research:theory and praxis.Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. 被引量:1
  • 10Haraway,D.(1988).Situated knowledge:The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.Feminist Studies,14(3),575-599. 被引量:1

二级参考文献22

  • 1范冬萍.论突现性质的下向因果关系——回应Jaegwon Kim对下向因果关系的反驳[J].哲学研究,2005(7):108-114. 被引量:16
  • 2约翰·霍兰.涌现—从混沌到有序[M].上海科技出版社,2001.5、4、199-205. 被引量:3
  • 3哈肯.协同学[M].上海:上海科学普及出版社,1988.173. 被引量:5
  • 4McKelvey Bill. Complexity Theory in Organization Science:Seizing the Promise or Becoming a Fad?[J]. Emergence,1999,1(1):5-25. 被引量:1
  • 5金吾伦.管理科学与复杂性科学[N].光明日报,2000-08-15. 被引量:1
  • 6The Study of Complex System[EB/OL]. http://www.pscs.umich.edu/complexity-eg.html. 被引量:1
  • 7Jeffrey Goldstein. Emergence as a Construct:History and Issues[J]. Emergence,1999,1(1):49-72. 被引量:1
  • 8司马贺.人工科学—复杂性面面观[M].武夷山译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2004. 被引量:1
  • 9F. Heylighen. Self-organization, Emergence and the Architecture of Complexity [ A] . Proceeding of the European Congresson System Science [C]. (ed.) Publisher. AFCET. Paris, 1992. 被引量:1
  • 10米歇尔·沃尔德罗普.复杂—诞生于秩序与混沌边缘的科学[M].陈玲等译.北京:北京三联书店,1997. 被引量:3

共引文献31

同被引文献17

  • 1张浩.亲和关系抑或虚假命题 重读《新教伦理与资本主义精神》[J].社会,2007,27(4):195-204. 被引量:4
  • 2Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory proce- dures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage. 被引量:1
  • 3Denzin, N. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, (2nd ed. ) New York: McGraw-Hill. 被引量:1
  • 4[美]霍华德·S.贝克尔.局外人:越轨的社会学研究[M].张默雪译.南京:南京大学出版社,2011. 被引量:1
  • 5Robinson, W. S. ( 1951 ). The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociologi- cal Review. 16:812-818. 被引量:1
  • 6Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press. 被引量:1
  • 7Gerring, J. (2001). Social science methodology: A critical framework. New York: Cam- bridge University Press:231-232. 被引量:1
  • 8Jones, C. (1974). Doing before knowing: Concept development in political research. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 18, no. 1 (February), pp. 215-228. 被引量:1
  • 9Dean, J. , Eichhorn, R. & Dean, L. (1969). Limitations and advantages of unstructured methods. In G. McCall & J. Simmons. (eds). Issues in participant observation: A text and reader reading. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, pp. 19-24. 被引量:1
  • 10Gerring, J. (2001). Social science methodology: A critical framework. New York: Cam- bridge University Press,22-23. 被引量:1

引证文献1

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部